直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson

TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. et al.

Filed an amicus brief on behalf of non-parties Toyota Motor Corporation, Honda Motor Company, Nissan Motor Company, DENSO Corporation, and Hyundai Motor Company in a Federal Circuit appeal involving issues related to standard-essential patents.

TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. et al. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, 18-1363, -1380, -1382, -1732, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Chen, Hughes

Related Professionals

J. Preston (J.P.) Long, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4347
Email

Related Practices

Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions

Standard Essential Patents (SEPs)

Opinions and Counseling

Licensing, Pooling, and Other Transactions

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electronic Devices and Components

Transportation and Logistics

Automotive and Smart Mobility Tech

Related Experiences

Vacating a $110 million judgment against Finnegan client TCL Communication

TCL Communication Technology

iFlight Technology Company, Ltd. et al. v. ITC

iFlight Technology Company, Ltd. et al.

Certain Wireless Communications Base Stations

Ericsson Inc.; Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson

Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Taiwan Semiconductor Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Taiwan Semiconductor Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Cox Communications v. Sprint Communication Co.

Sprint Communication Co.

$45 million judgment overturned for Ericsson

Ericsson Inc.

Markem-Imaje Corp. v. Zipher, Ltd.

Zipher, Ltd.; Videojet Technologies

Trading Technologies, Inc. v. CQG, Inc.

Trading Technologies, Inc.

ClearOne, Inc. v. Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc.

Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP