Partner
Ryan O’Quinn, Ph.D., leader of Finnegan’s biotechnology and pharmaceutical practice group, has extensive pre-trial and trial U.S. district court litigation experience, with a particular focus on remedies and injunctive relief in the life sciences. With a background in cell and molecular biology, Ryan also maintains a patent prosecution and counseling practice in the fields of small molecule drugs, biologics, medical devices, biosensors, and nucleic acid compositions.
Ryan’s practice covers a range of technologies, including pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, immunotherapy, medical devices, computer software, business methods, vending technologies, and mechanical systems. In 2024, he was shortlisted for Patent Strategy Attorney of the Year (DC Metro) by LMG Life Sciences. Ryan is recognized in the 2026 edition of Best Lawyers (Biotechnology and Life Sciences Practice).
Ryan leads the firm’s military veteran’s pro bono programs, and has successfully represented, including as lead counsel, over a dozen disabled veterans before the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. He also serves as a member of the Friends Board of the Legal Services of Northern Virginia.
Prior to joining Finnegan, Ryan conducted doctoral and undergraduate research in cellular and molecular biology and biomedical engineering. His research, including work at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Marine Biological Laboratory at Woods Hole, focused on advanced microscopy techniques and molecular mechanisms regulating cell division. Ryan previously served as an adjunct professor at George Washington University Law School in the Scholarly Writing Program, where he supervised student members of the Federal Circuit Bar Journal. He has participated as a panel advisor during the Pitch Rounds competition of the Southeast BIO (SEBIO) Annual Life Sciences Venture Capital Conference. Ryan also served as an advisor to the Southeast Life Sciences (SLSA) ADVANSE Virtual Pitch Rounds competition which featured early-stage life sciences companies developing solutions related to COVID-19.
2:23-cv-00094, 2:23-cv-02364, D.N.J., Judges Cecchi, Padin, Wettre
Represented Eli Lilly in patent litigations involving antibody therapies.
1:18-cv-12029, D. Mass., Judge Burroughs
Represented Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and its licensor The University of Western Australia in patent litigation relating to nucleic acid therapies for treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). A federal jury in the District of Delaware awarded Sarepta Therapeutics over $115 million in its patent infringement case against Nippon Shinyaku Co. Ltd. This substantial verdict upholds the validity of Sarepta's groundbreaking exon-skipping treatment, and the underlying work at the University of Western Australia.
1:21-cv-01015, D. Del., Judges Hall, Williams
1:18-cv-00664, D. Del., Judge Andrews
1:17-cv-00414, D. Del., Judges Goldberg, Thynge
1:15-cv-01000, D. Del., Judge Andrews
2:19-cv-00209; 2:20-cv-00070, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
1:19-cv-01539, D. Del., Judge Stark
1:13-cv-00707, S.D. Ohio, Judge Dlott
Represented Eli Lilly in a district court contempt proceeding enforcing a permanent injunction covering its Zyprexa® drug product.
1:01-cv-00443, S.D. Ind., Judges LaRue, Lynch, Shields, Young
05-1429, -1430, Fed. Cir., Judges Rader, Schall, Gajarsa
Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Represented Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and its licensor The University of Western Australia in patent litigation relating to nucleic acid therapies for treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). A federal jury in the District of Delaware awarded Sarepta Therapeutics over $115 million in its patent infringement case against Nippon Shinyaku Co. Ltd. This substantial verdict upholds the validity of Sarepta's groundbreaking exon-skipping treatment, and the underlying work at the University of Western Australia.
1:21-cv-01015, D. Del., Judges Hall, Williams
Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lilly and Company
Represented Eli Lilly in patent litigations involving antibody therapies.
1:18-cv-12029, D. Mass., Judge Burroughs
AstraZeneca AB v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.
Representing AstraZeneca in Hatch-Waxman litigations against several defendants involving the diabetes drug Farxiga®.
1:18-cv-00664, D. Del., Judge Andrews
Shire ViroPharma Inc. v. CSL Behring LLC
1:17-cv-00414, D. Del., Judges Goldberg, Thynge
AstraZeneca LP v. SigmaPharm Laboratories
Representing AstraZeneca in Hatch-Waxman litigations against several defendants involving the blood-thinning drug Brilinta®.
1:15-cv-01000, D. Del., Judge Andrews
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC v. Hetero USA Inc., Lupin Limited et al.
2:23-cv-00094, 2:23-cv-02364, D.N.J., Judges Cecchi, Padin, Wettre
Workshop
Protecting Innovation in the Life Sciences: Updates and Key Trends in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology IP Law Protecting Innovation in the Life Sciences: Updates and Key Trends in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology IP Law
May 7, 2026
Cambridge
Panel Discussion
Turning Research Into a Venture: An IP Roadmap Turning Research Into a Venture: An IP Roadmap
February 3, 2026
Boston
Articles
How the Timing of Hypothetical Negotiation Can Lead to a Higher Premium for Exclusivity How the Timing of Hypothetical Negotiation Can Lead to a Higher Premium for Exclusivity
December/January 2026
LandslideConference
AgBio 2025: Innovating Agricultural Resilience AgBio 2025: Innovating Agricultural Resilience
April 8-9, 2025
Raleigh
Commentary
Finnegan Taps Partner from Kirkland to Boost IP Team Finnegan Taps Partner from Kirkland to Boost IP Team
June 12, 2026
Law360Commentary
Finnegan Hires Kirkland Partner as It Eyes UK Growth Finnegan Hires Kirkland Partner as It Eyes UK Growth
June 8, 2026
Managing Intellectual PropertyCommentary
The Supreme Court Revisits Skinny Labeling: Why Hikma v. Amarin Matters The Supreme Court Revisits Skinny Labeling: Why Hikma v. Amarin Matters
January 26, 2026
Award/Ranking
Best Lawyers Recognizes 44 Finnegan Attorneys in its 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers and Ones to Watch Best Lawyers Recognizes 44 Finnegan Attorneys in its 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers and Ones to Watch
August 21, 2025
Best LawyersCommentary
Behind the Case: How Latham & Finnegan Secured $115m Biotech Win Behind the Case: How Latham & Finnegan Secured $115m Biotech Win
January 9, 2025
Managing Intellectual PropertyCommentary
Litigators of the Week: Defending Against a $290M Claim and Scoring a $116M Win in Drug Patent Fight Litigators of the Week: Defending Against a $290M Claim and Scoring a $116M Win in Drug Patent Fight
January 9, 2025
The AmLaw Litigation DailyDue to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.