Experience
Trading Technologies, Inc.
CQG, Inc.
Argued on behalf of patent owner Trading Technologies, obtaining ruling that claims to inventive graphical user interface are patentable under 35 USC 101.
Trading Technologies, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., 16-1616, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, O'Malley, Wallach
Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc.
Trading Technologies International, Inc.
Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc. v. Movea, Inc.
Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc.
Prolitec Inc. v. Scentair Techs., Inc.
Prolitec Inc.
Kinetic Technologies, Inc. v. Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc.
Kinetic Technologies, Inc.
Cox Communications v. Sprint Communication Co.
Sprint Communication Co.
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.
Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Affymetrix, Inc.
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Rambus, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc.
Rambus, Inc.
5th Market, Inc. v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc.
Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.