Experience
Harris Corp.
Ericsson Inc.
Finnegan convinced the Federal Circuit to wipe out a $45 million judgment against Ericsson. Harris Corporation had sued Ericsson in the Northern District of Texas on a patent related to technology for correcting intersymbol interference, which can arise during use of communications equipment such as cell phones. The Federal Circuit agreed that the district court misconstrued the claims, and erred in its calculation of the appropriate royalty rate. The Federal Circuit also ruled against Harris on its cross-appeal, which concerned the award of enhanced damages.
Harris Corp. v. Ericsson Inc., 03-1625, -1626, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Clevenger, Gajarsa
Vacating a $110 million judgment against Finnegan client TCL Communication
TCL Communication Technology
Chen (Aventis)
United Catalysts turns to Finnegan to reverse an unfavorable judgment and $80 million in damages
United Catalysts
Integra Life Sciences v. Merck KGaA
Merck KgaA
Federal Circuit upholds $140 million judgment for Sprint on VoIP patents
Sprint Communications Company LP
Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.
Allcare Health Management System, Inc.
TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. et al.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.