直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd.

Ericsson Inc.

TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd.

After an Eastern District of Texas jury found willful infringement and the court entered a judgment of at least $110 million ($75 million jury award, plus $25 million enhancement and prejudgment interest), he argued, as lead appellate counsel, the appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In a precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit reversed under 35 U.S.C. § 101, held the asserted claims patent-ineligible, and vacated the entire judgment. The Federal Circuit also awarded costs to TCL; on remand, the Eastern District of Texas awarded TCL $2.35 million in costs.

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd., 2:15-cv-00011, E.D. Tex., Nowak

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd., 18-2003, Fed. Cir., Judges Chen, Newman, Prost

Related Professionals

Lionel M. Lavenue
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2750
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electronic Devices and Components

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Related Experiences

Vacating a $110 million judgment against Finnegan client TCL Communication

TCL Communication Technology

TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson

TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. et al.

Paradox Security Systems, Ltd. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.

ADT Security Services, Inc.; Digital Security Controls

NFC Technology LLC v. Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd.

NFC Technology LLC

MemSmart Semiconductor Corp. v. AAC Technologies Pte. Ltd.

AAC Technologies Pte. Ltd.

IDQ Operating, Inc. v. Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd. 

Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd.

Lochner Technologies LLC v. Toshiba America, Inc.

Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.

Guardian Media Technologies Ltd. v. TTE Technology Inc. 

TTE Technology Inc.

Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. LG Electronics Inc. et al.

LG Electronics Inc. et al.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP