Experience
Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd.
Ericsson Inc.
TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd.
After an Eastern District of Texas jury found willful infringement and the court entered a judgment of at least $110 million ($75 million jury award, plus $25 million enhancement and prejudgment interest), he argued, as lead appellate counsel, the appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In a precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit reversed under 35 U.S.C. § 101, held the asserted claims patent-ineligible, and vacated the entire judgment. The Federal Circuit also awarded costs to TCL; on remand, the Eastern District of Texas awarded TCL $2.35 million in costs.
Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd., 2:15-cv-00011, E.D. Tex., Nowak
Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd., 18-2003, Fed. Cir., Judges Chen, Newman, Prost
Vacating a $110 million judgment against Finnegan client TCL Communication
TCL Communication Technology
TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. et al.
Paradox Security Systems, Ltd. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
ADT Security Services, Inc.; Digital Security Controls
NFC Technology LLC v. Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd.
NFC Technology LLC
MemSmart Semiconductor Corp. v. AAC Technologies Pte. Ltd.
AAC Technologies Pte. Ltd.
IDQ Operating, Inc. v. Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd.
Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd.
Lochner Technologies LLC v. Toshiba America, Inc.
Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
Guardian Media Technologies Ltd. v. TTE Technology Inc.
TTE Technology Inc.
Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. LG Electronics Inc. et al.
LG Electronics Inc. et al.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.