直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Obtaining urgent relief for Under Armour against trademark infringement in China

Under Armour

Uncle Martian

On what happened to be World Intellectual Property Day, a Chinese company calling itself “Uncle Martian” staged a high-profile fashion show to announce its entry into the athletic apparel industry. The launch went viral—drawing immediate criticism from the international community—as Uncle Martian had blatantly copied Under Armour’s famous UA logo and shoe designs. In collaboration with local counsel in China, Finnegan and Under Armour quickly commenced legal action before the People’s Higher Court of Fujian Province of the People’s Republic of China, seeking preliminary and permanent injunctions, monetary damages, and other relief against Uncle Martian’s multitude of violations of China’s trademark and unfair competition laws. Following the submission of clear evidence of infringement and in anticipation of the commercial launch of Uncle Martian’s knock-off products, the Higher Court issued a preliminary injunction in Under Armour’s favor. The Higher Court then issued a further ruling ordering Uncle Martian to permanently stop using the contested trademarks, destroy all infringing products, pay approximately $300,000 (RMB 2,000,000) in damages, and publish a statement to “eliminate the adverse effect of Uncle Martian’s infringement.” The Supreme People’s Court, the highest court in China, affirmed the decision, securing a complete win for Under Armour.

This case is significant because injunctions, particularly preliminary injunctions, have rarely been granted by Chinese courts. The Higher Court’s and Supreme People's Court's recognition of Under Armour’s valuable intellectual property rights and the urgency in protecting those rights sends a strong message to would-be copycats and supports Under Armour’s continued growth in an important market. 

Related Professionals

Danny M. Awdeh
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4353
Email
Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email
Yinfei Wu
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4428
Email

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure

Sports, Fitness, and Outdoor Recreation

Related Experiences

Under Armour defends its ARMOUR trademark against snowboard apparel infringement

Under Armour

Finnegan secures strategic damages award for Under Armour in trademark infringement litigation

Under Armour

Experience_Preliminary_injunction_motion_denied_in_favor_of_Finnegan_client_Under_Armour

Preliminary injunction motion denied in favor of Finnegan client Under Armour

Under Armour Inc.

Under Armour, Inc. v. Salt Armour, Inc.

Under Armour, Inc.

Under Armour, Inc. v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.

Under Armour, Inc.

Under Armour, Inc. v. Energy Armor, Inc.

Under Armour, Inc.

Rawlings Sporting Goods Company Inc. v. Under Armour, Inc.

Under Armour, Inc.

Potential harm to AMC’s reputation increased urgent need for preliminary relief

AMC Mortgage Corp. (AMC)

Software code for video game controllers developed in China is protected in a copyright infringement claim

SplitFish AG, SplitFish Gameware, Inc., and Nabon Corp.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP