Experience
Paradox Security Systems, Ltd.
ADT Security Services, Inc.; Digital Security Controls
Defended accused infringers ADT and Digital Security Controls, both part of Tyco International, in a case involving a telephone line coupler; obtained directed verdict of no infringement, which was affirmed on appeal.
Paradox Security Systems, Ltd. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.; Digital Security Controls, 2:06-cv-00462, E.D. Tex., Judge Ward
Paradox Security Systems, Ltd. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.; Digital Security Controls, 10-1012, Fed. Cir., Judges Bryson, Newman, Schall
Directed verdict on behalf of defendants in the Eastern District of Texas
ADT Security Systems, Inc. and Digital Security Controls, Ltd.
R2 Solutions LLC v. FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.
FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.,
Hyundai Motor Co.; Kia Motors Corp.
Arthur A. Collins, Inc. v. Northern Telecom Ltd.
Northern Telecom Ltd. (Nortel)
Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. Universal Security Instruments Inc.
Leviton Manufacturing Co.
Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC and Rembrandt Secure Computing, LP v. Apple Inc.
Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC; Rembrandt Secure Computing
Guardian Media Technologies Ltd. v. TTE Technology Inc.
TTE Technology Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.