直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Finnegan client Elan protected against antitrust claims based on ANDA settlement

Andrx Pharmaceuticals

Elan Corporation PLC

Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Andrx”) filed suit against Finnegan client Elan Corporation PLC, alleging that Elan violated the federal antitrust Sherman Act and various Florida antitrust statutes by entering into a settlement agreement in an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) patent infringement litigation that Elan brought against another company, and by initiating an ANDA litigation against Andrx relating to the same patent. Finnegan obtained judgment on the pleadings in Elan’s favor on all issues at the outset of the case. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the majority of the holdings, including that the Noerr-Pennington doctrine shielded Elan from Andrx’s patent misuse claims relating to Elan’s assertion of its patent against Andrx. The Eleventh Circuit remanded the settlement agreement holding for further proceedings. Andrx ultimately agreed to dismiss the claim.

Andrx Pharmaceuticals v. Elan Corporation PLC, 03-13605, 11th Cir., Judges Birch, Dowd, Wilson

Elan Corporation PLC v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, 1:00-cv-03481, S.D. Fla., Judge Jordan

Related Professionals

James B. Monroe
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4159
Email
Paul W. Browning, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4134
Email
Michael J. Flibbert
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4493
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials

Antitrust and Misuse

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Pharmaceutical

Biotechnology

Related Experiences

Finnegan and GSK’s antitrust counsel worked together to protect GSK against antitrust claims based on ANDA settlement

GlaxoSmithKline

A high-impact result for R&D licensing programs in the pharmaceutical industry

Elan Corporation PLC

District court rules in favor of Finnegan client AbbVie

AbbVie Inc.

Federal Circuit affirms claim construction and summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of Finnegan client Pergo

Pergo LLC

District court grants summary judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Toyota against Solomon Technologies, Inc.

Toyota Motor Corp.

Philips protected against antitrust and misuse charges in DVD and CD infringement litigation

U.S. Philips Corp.

District court enters judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Philips

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eon Labs, Inc.

Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Protecting the integrity of the American Petroleum Institute's engine oil certification program

American Petroleum Institute

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP