Experience
Hy-Ko Prods
The Hillman Group
Finnegan defended The Hillman Group against charges that it monopolized or attempted to monopolize in the key duplication marketplace. Finnegan negotiated a favorable settlement of the claims.
Hy-Ko Prods v. The Hillman Group, 5:10-cv-00992, N.D. Ohio, Judge Dowd
The Hillman Group, Inc. v. Minute Key, Inc.
The Hillman Group
Velocys, Inc. et al. v. Catacel Corp.
Catacel Corp.
KeyMe, LLC v. The Hillman Group, Inc.
The Hillman Group, Inc.
The Hillman Group, Inc. v. KeyMe, LLC
The Hillman Group, Inc.
Goodman v. Winbond Electronics Corp.
Winbond Electronics Corp.
Superior Graphite Co. v. TIMCAL S.A., Ltd.
TIMCAL S.A., Ltd.
Technical Consumer Products, Inc. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Tessera, Inc. v. UTAC (Taiwan) Corp.
UTAC (Taiwan) Corp.
Sun Microsystems
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.