Experience
Apple Inc.
VirnetX Inc.
Represented the patent owner VirnetX in obtaining non-institution decisions from the Board in two inter partes reviews. Apple recognized that its petitions were time-barred under 35 U.S.C. 315(b) because the petitions were filed more than a year after VirnetX had served Apple with a complaint alleging infringement of the challenged patent. But Apple sought to avoid the time bar by seeking to join its new cases to ongoing inter partes reviews against a different patent. The Board declined Apple’s request to join cases involving different patents. The Board then denied Apple’s petitions as time-barred.
Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc., IPR2014-00485, -00486, PTAB, Judges Easthom, Siu, Tierney
Biogen MA Inc.
OpenTV, Inc.
Finnegan goes three-for-three in IPR non-institution decisions for client inMusic
inMusic Brands, Inc.
Finnegan secures a non-institution decision at the PTAB for Health Diagnostic Laboratory
Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc,
Video game maker Harmonix succeeds in invalidating asserted litigation claims using IPR
Harmonix Music Systems, Inc.
Finnegan secures a non-institution decision at the PTAB for client iFLY Holdings LLC
iFLY Holdings LLC
Finnegan client AbbVie secures non-institution decisions for Humira® patents
AbbVie Biotechnology, Ltd
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.