直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Finnegan goes three-for-three in IPR non-institution decisions for client inMusic

Roland Corp.

inMusic Brands, Inc.

Patent owner inMusic asserted three patents related to its electronic drum kit technology against Roland AG, in a case filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island. In response, Roland filed at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes review (IPR) petitions on all three patents, asserting more than 100 invalidity grounds. inMusic chose Finnegan to defend its patents and file patent owner responses to each IPR petition. Finnegan argued that the prior art did not disclose inMusic’s inventions. The PTAB agreed and denied institution in all three IPRs, resulting in a complete win for inMusic.

Roland Corp. v. inMusic Brands, Inc., IPR2018-00332, -00335, -00396 , PTAB, Judges Chagnon, Jivani, Stephens, Margolies

Related Professionals

Cory C. Bell
Partner
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1641
Email

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electronic Devices and Components

Electrical and Computer Technology

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Manufacturing

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure

Media

Related Experiences

Finnegan secures a non-institution decision at the PTAB for client iFLY Holdings LLC

iFLY Holdings LLC

Finnegan secures a non-institution decision at the PTAB for Health Diagnostic Laboratory

Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc,

Finnegan client AbbVie secures non-institution decisions for Humira® patents

AbbVie Biotechnology, Ltd

Rare PTAB rehearing request granted for Finnegan client Incyte

Incyte Corp.

AbbVie secures four non-institution decisions for Humira® patent

AbbVie Biotechnology, Ltd.

Finnegan successfully defends Incyte against institution of PGR proceeding

Incyte Corp.

PTAB grants VirnetX additional discovery and ultimately denies IPR institution

VirnetX Inc.

PTAB rules in favor of Finnegan client Neste Oil Oyj in IPR proceeding

Neste Oyj

PTAB holds three slow-cooker designs unpatentable in rare design patent IPR

Sensio, Inc

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP