直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

PTAB grants VirnetX additional discovery and ultimately denies IPR institution

RPX Corp.

VirnetX Inc.

Several patents owned by Finnegan client VirnetX were challenged through seven inter partes review (IPR) petitions filed by RPX. The facts suggested that RPX had been acting on behalf of another, unnamed time-barred entity. In the window between the filing of the petitions and the due date for its preliminary responses, VirnetX sought discovery on the relationship between RPX and the other entity. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) authorized VirnetX to file a motion for additional discovery and granted the motion—one of the few instances where the PTAB authorized, let alone granted, a motion for additional discovery. Leveraging the discovery in its preliminary responses, VirnetX secured non-institution decisions from the Board, which found that the petitioner was acting as proxy for the time-barred entity—the true real party-in-interest. 

RPX Corp. v. VirnetX Inc., IPR2014-00171, -00172, -00173, -00174, -00175, -00176, -00177, PTAB, Judges Easthom, Siu, Tierney

Related Professionals

Jason E. Stach
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6428
Email
Elliot C. Cook
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2738
Email
Pier D. DeRoo
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4418
Email

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Industries

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related Experiences

IPR institution denied for Microsoft challenges against VirnetX patents

VirnetX

Microsoft Corp. v. VirnetX Inc.

VirnetX Inc.

Joinder and IPR institution denied based on time bar

VirnetX Inc.

Microsoft Corporation v. VirnetX, Inc.

VirnetX, Inc.

RPX Corporation; Michael Farmwald v. ParkerVision, Inc.

ParkerVision, Inc.

Rare PTAB rehearing request granted for Finnegan client Incyte

Incyte Corp.

Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc.

OpenTV, Inc.

IPR challenges to VirnetX patents averted through preliminary responses

VirnetX

New Bay Capital, LLC v. VirnetX, Inc.

VirnetX, Inc.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP