直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Finnegan secures a non-institution decision at the PTAB for Health Diagnostic Laboratory

Boston Heart Diagnostics Corp.

Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc,

Finnegan client Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc. (HDL) served Boston Health Diagnostics Corporation with a complaint in the Eastern District of Virginia, alleging infringement of its patent directed to methods of predicting the risk of developing diabetes based on a model HDL developed using unique biomarker combinations. Boston Heart immediately petitioned the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute an inter partes review (IPR) challenging HDL’s asserted claims as anticipated and obvious in view of several prior art references. Finnegan secured a non-institution decision for HDL through arguments raised in its patent owner’s preliminary response that Boston Heart failed to demonstrate the prior art taught the diagnostic model using the claimed biomarker panels. The PTAB denied institution on all grounds, concluding that the petition failed to adequately explain how the cited references disclose the model as claimed.

Boston Heart Diagnostics Corp. v. Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc,, IPR2015-00557, PTAB, Judges Elluru, Franklin, Paulraj

Related Professionals

Adriana L. Burgy
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4345
Email

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Pharmaceutical

Related Experiences

Boston Heart Diagnostics Corp. v. Health Diagnostic Laboratories

Health Diagnostic Laboratories

Finnegan secures a non-institution decision at the PTAB for client iFLY Holdings LLC

iFLY Holdings LLC

Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. v. Radiometer Medical ApS

Radiometer Medical ApS

Finnegan client AbbVie secures non-institution decisions for Humira® patents

AbbVie Biotechnology, Ltd

Lo v. Quake

Sequenom, Inc. et al

Auris Health, Inc. v. Intuitive Surgical Operations

Intuitive Surgical Operations

AbbVie secures four non-institution decisions for Humira® patent

AbbVie Biotechnology, Ltd.

Finnegan goes three-for-three in IPR non-institution decisions for client inMusic

inMusic Brands, Inc.

Represented a UK-based innovative diagnostics company, in a patent litigation relating to non-invasive prenatal testing*

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP