直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Securing $240 million and a jury verdict of willful infringement for Promptu in patent case against Comcast

Promptu Systems Corporation

US Synthetic secures ITC exclusion order barring polycrystalline diamond compacts (PDCs)

US Synthetic Corporation

Achieving precedent in preserving valuable patents for Lumify®

Eye Therapies, LLC

Finnegan client Maglula delivers crushing blow to Amazon’s arbitration practices over counterfeit products

Maglula, Ltd.

Finnegan secures $180M for CSRC in complex arbitrations

CSRC et al.

Protecting a blockbuster diabetes treatment for AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca AB

Major victories across IP venues for Volkswagen, Audi, Bentley, and Lamborghini

Audi AG; Audi of America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.; Bentley Motors Limited; Bentley Motors, Inc; Volkswagen AG; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

Finnegan tees up valuable patents for Eisai, leading to major strategic collaboration agreement

Eisai Co., Ltd.

Finnegan helps Intellia Therapeutics acquire Rewrite Therapeutics, Inc. for $45 million

Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Recent Experience

Experience

Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. et al. v. Syngenta Seeds, LLC Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. et al. v. Syngenta Seeds, LLC

1:22-cv-01280, D. Del.

Experience

Bayer Cropscience LP et al. v. Corteva Agriscience LLC et al. Bayer Cropscience LP et al. v. Corteva Agriscience LLC et al.

N22C-07-168, Delaware Superior Court, Complex Commercial Litigation Division

Experience

Corteva Agriscience LLC v. Monsanto Company et al. Corteva Agriscience LLC v. Monsanto Company et al.

1:22-cv-01046, D. Del., Judge Williams

Experience

Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lilly and Company Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lilly and Company

2020-1747, -1748, -1749, -1750, -1751, -1752, -1876, -1877, -1878, Fed. Cir.

Experience

Danisco US Inc. v. Novozymes A/S Danisco US Inc. v. Novozymes A/S

IPR2019-01010, PTAB

Experience

Finnegan tees up valuable patents for Principia Biopharma, leading to major acquisition deal

Finnegan tees up valuable patents for Principia Biopharma, leading to major acquisition deal Finnegan tees up valuable patents for Principia Biopharma, leading to major acquisition deal

Principia Biopharma

Experience

Eli Lilly and Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals International Eli Lilly and Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals International

IPR2018-01422; -01423; -01424; -01425; -01426; -01427; -01710, -01711, -01712, PTAB

Experience

Finnegan client AbbVie secures non-institution decisions for Humira® patents Finnegan client AbbVie secures non-institution decisions for Humira® patents

IPR2018-01987, -01988, PTAB, Judges Ankenbrand, Harlow, Mitchell

Experience

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. VirnetX, Inc.  Cisco Systems, Inc. v. VirnetX, Inc. 

95/001,679, 95/001,746, 95/001,792, 95/001,851, 95/001,856, USPTO, Judges Foster, Hughes, Peikari, Pokrzywa

Experience

AbbVie secures four non-institution decisions for Humira® patent AbbVie secures four non-institution decisions for Humira® patent

IPR2017-00822, -00823, -01008, -01009, PTAB, Judges Ankenbrand, Hulse, Mitchell

Experience

Apple, Inc. v. VirnetX, Inc.  Apple, Inc. v. VirnetX, Inc. 

95/001,682, 95/001,697, 95/001,714, 95/001,788, 95/001,789, 95/001,949, USPTO, Judges Peikari, Foster, Yigdall, Bonshock

Experience

IPR institution denied for Microsoft challenges against VirnetX patents IPR institution denied for Microsoft challenges against VirnetX patents

IPR2014-00401, -00405, -00558, PTAB, Judges Easthom, Siu, Tierney

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP