Experience
Danisco US Inc.
Novozymes A/S
Represented Danisco in IPR challenge to Novozymes patent relating to process of recovering oil during ethanol production, leading to favorable institution decision followed by Novozymes’ request for adverse judgment.
Danisco US Inc. v. Novozymes A/S, IPR2019-01010, PTAB
Pfenex Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA
GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA
ClearOne, Inc. v. Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc.
Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc.
Sandoz, Inc. et al v. Pharmacyclics LLC
Pharmacyclics LLC; Janssen Biotech, Inc.
Auris Health, Inc. v. Intuitive Surgical Operations
Intuitive Surgical Operations
William Hill U.S. Holdco, Inc. v. CG Technology Development, LLC
CG Technology Development, LLC
NetApp, Inc./HPE et al. v. KOM Software Inc.
NetApp, Inc/HPE et al.
Georgetown Rail Equipment Company v. Tetra Tech Canada, Inc.
Tetra Tech Canada, Inc.
OpenTV, Inc.
OpenTV, Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.