Experience
Sensio, Inc
Select Brands, Inc.
Finnegan successfully represented Sensio, Inc. in IPR proceedings involving three design patents directed to triple slow-cooker designs. Sensio established that the claimed designs were in the prior art and countered the patent owner's attempt to antedate the prior art references. After an oral argument, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) found all three patents to be anticipated and obvious in view of prior designs. Finnegan also represented Sensio in the co-pending district court litigation in Kansas, which Finnegan successfully argued should be stayed during the pendency of the IPR proceedings.
Sensio, Inc v. Select Brands, Inc., IPR2013-00500, -00501, -00580, PTAB, Judges Cocks, Giannetti, Wood
Select Brands, Inc. v. Sensio, Inc, 2:13-cv-02108, D. Kan., Judges Rushfelt, Vratil
PTAB holds unpatentable in IPR all claims in Clouding's data synchronization patent
Rackspace Hosting, Inc.
Finnegan goes three-for-three in IPR non-institution decisions for client inMusic
inMusic Brands, Inc.
FIS successfully uses PTAB to invalidate quintessential “Business Method Patents”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS)
Video game maker Harmonix succeeds in invalidating asserted litigation claims using IPR
Harmonix Music Systems, Inc.
Flectere LLC v. FedEx Corporation
FedEx Corporation
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.