直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Firm
  • Offices
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • Enforcement and Litigation
    • Portfolio and Market Strategy
    • Patent Invalidation Proceedings
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • Blockchain, NFTs, and Other Digital Assets
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Electronics and Information Technology
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Federal Circuit rules Rambus semiconductor memory patent not anticipated

Rambus Inc.

David J. Kappos

The Federal Circuit reversed an anticipation ruling by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board, which had found two claims of a Rambus patent to be “unsupported by substantial evidence.” The appellate panel sided with Finnegan client Rambus and reversed the finding. The Federal Circuit ruling is the latest development in a series of reexaminations requested by Micron.

Rambus Inc. v. David J. Kappos, 11-1247, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Linn, Rader

Related Professionals

James_Barney
James R. Barney
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4412
Email

Related Experiences

Rambus, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc.

Rambus, Inc.

Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client in radial arm saw guard patent case

Michael S. Powell

Jury decision upheld by Federal Circuit for DuPont Air Products NanoMaterials

DuPont Air Products NanoMaterials, LLC

Federal Circuit clears Lawson Software in reversal of patent infringement decision

Lawson Software

Certain Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing Same

Rambus Inc.

Federal Circuit confirms Patent Trial and Appeal Board wins for FedEx

FedEx Corp.

Unified Patents prevails in Federal Circuit appeal challenging PTAB final written decision

Unified Patents, Inc.

Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan clients Hyundai and Kia in a tire pressure monitoring system patent case

Hyundai Motor Co.; Kia Motors Corp.

DuPont prevails on a written description defense to patent infringement at the Federal Circuit

DuPont Nutrition Biosciences APS

Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

The Finnegan UPC Hub is a one-stop shop for our insights related to the Unified Patent Court (UPC).

Finnegan
Click Here
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • EEO Statement

© 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP