David J. Kappos
The Federal Circuit reversed an anticipation ruling by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board, which had found two claims of a Rambus patent to be “unsupported by substantial evidence.” The appellate panel sided with Finnegan client Rambus and reversed the finding. The Federal Circuit ruling is the latest development in a series of reexaminations requested by Micron.
Rambus Inc. v. David J. Kappos, 11-1247, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Linn, Rader
Rambus, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc.
Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client in radial arm saw guard patent case
Michael S. Powell
Jury decision upheld by Federal Circuit for DuPont Air Products NanoMaterials
DuPont Air Products NanoMaterials, LLC
Unified Patents prevails in Federal Circuit appeal challenging PTAB final written decision
Unified Patents, Inc.
Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan clients Hyundai and Kia in a tire pressure monitoring system patent case
Hyundai Motor Co.; Kia Motors Corp.
DuPont prevails on a written description defense to patent infringement at the Federal Circuit
DuPont Nutrition Biosciences APS
The Finnegan UPC Hub is a one-stop shop for our insights related to the Unified Patent Court (UPC).