直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Federal Circuit confirms Patent Trial and Appeal Board wins for FedEx

IpVenture, Inc.

FedEx Corp.

Finnegan client FedEx was accused of patent infringement in two separate litigations in the Northern District of California, where IpVenture asserted two related patents directed to processes used in connection with tracking packages with the aid of a device called “SenseAware,” which enables users to track the location and certain conditions of related packages. On behalf of FedEx, Finnegan filed an inter partes reexamination on one patent, and an inter partes review (IPR) on the other at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The USPTO granted both petitions, and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) affirmed the rejection of all claims of the reexamined patent and invalidated all claims of the second patent during the IPR. The district court cases were stayed during the USPTO proceedings and during IpVenture’s appeal to the Federal Circuit, which affirmed both of the PTAB’s decisions.

IpVenture, Inc. v. FedEx Corp., 4:11-cv-05367, N.D. Cal., Judges Hamilton, Ryu

IpVenture, Inc. v. FedEx Corp., 4:14-cv-04894, N.D. Cal., Judges Beeler, Hamilton, Seeborg

FedEx Corp. v. IpVenture, Inc., IPR2014-00833, PTAB, Judges Droesch, Lee, Zecher

IpVenture, Inc. v. FedEx Corp., 16-1911, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, O'Malley

Related Professionals

Jeffrey A. Berkowitz
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2710
Email
Michael V. Young
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2788
Email

Related Practices

Appeals from the PTAB

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Ex Parte Reexamination (EPR)

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related Experiences

Federal Circuit confirms last IV patent at issue in E.D. Tex. Trial invalid

FedEx Corp.

Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC and Rembrandt Secure Computing, LP v. Apple Inc.

Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC; Rembrandt Secure Computing

Finnegan client FedEx defeats Ronald Katz’s 11 year licensing litigation

FedEx Corp.

Finnegan trial team defeats $260 million patent and trade dress suit for clients ABBYY Software and Lexmark

ABBYY Software, Ltd., Lexmark

R2 Solutions LLC v. FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.

FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.,

Insight Development Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard

Hewlett-Packard

Federal Circuit, district court, and arbitration victories protect Cumberland Pharmaceuticals’ flagship product, Acetadote®

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals

Favorable Federal Circuit ruling confirms the existence of a separate written description requirement

Eli Lilly and Company

FIS successfully uses PTAB to invalidate quintessential “Business Method Patents”

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS)

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP