Experience
IDQ Operating, Inc.
Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd.
Finnegan successfully defended Aerospace Communications Holding Co., Ltd. (“ACH”) in a district court litigation brought by IDQ Operating, asserting a patent against coolant system servicing apparatus allegedly sold by ACH. Finnegan filed several IPRs against the asserted patents and leveraged favorable institution decisions, leading to a stay and dismissal of the district court case.
IDQ Operating, Inc. v. Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd., 6:15-cv-00781, E.D. Tex., Judges Gilstrap, Mitchell
IDQ Operating, Inc. v. Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd., IPR2016-00441, -00442, PTAB, Judges Kim, Weatherly, Goodson
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Shenzhen AOTO Electronics Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen AOTO Electronics Co., Ltd
NFC Technology LLC v. Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd.
NFC Technology LLC
Japan Display Inc. f/k/a Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. et al v. Tianma Microelectronics Co.
Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd.
Guardian Media Technologies Ltd. v. TTE Technology Inc.
TTE Technology Inc.
Azure Networks, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc.
Sony Electronics, Inc.
Compression Vectors LLC v. Axis Communications AB
Axis Communications AB
Sonix Tech. Co., Ltd. v. VTech Electronics North America, LLC
VTech Electronics North America, LLC
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.