Experience
Bernard F. DePalma
Nike, Inc.
Defended Nike in action involving hockey pads; obtained summary judgment of no infringement, and Federal Circuit affirmed that Nike did not infringe the patent at issue.
Bernard F. DePalma v. Nike, Inc., 5:95-cv-01428, N.D.N.Y., Judges Mordue, DiBianco
Bernard F. DePalma v. Nike, Inc., 05-1140, -1176, Fed. Cir., Judges Clevenger, Schall, Bryson
Mark A. Hoffman
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems v. Medtronic Vascular
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems
Digital Control v. Charles Machine
Digital Control
Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Affymetrix, Inc.
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew
Kinetic Concepts, Inc.
General Surgical v. Origin Medsystems
Origin Medsystems
UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks Corp.
Starent Networks Corp.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.