Experience
UTStarcom, Inc.
Starent Networks Corp.
Represented Starent Networks in a case involving a patent that described a way for mobile devices to connect to the Internet. Played a lead role in successfully opposing the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, and in Starent's claim construction and motion for summary judgment of noninfringement, which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit.
UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks Corp., 5:04-cv-01122, N.D. Cal., Judge Trumbull
UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks Corp., 06-1295, Fed. Cir., Judges Clevenger, Linn
UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks Corp.
Starent Networks Corp.
Nortel Networks, Ltd v. Optical Networks Inc.; Ciena Corp.
Nortel Networks Ltd.
BTG International, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
BTG International, Inc.
Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Affymetrix, Inc.
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Tessera, Inc. v. UTAC (Taiwan) Corp.
UTAC (Taiwan) Corp.
Insight Development Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard
Hewlett-Packard
Barco NV and Barco, Inc. v. Vivitek Corp. and Delta Electronics, Inc.
Delta Electronics, Inc.; Vivitek Corporation
Actuate Corp. v. Fidelity National Information Services Inc.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Zircon Corp. v. Ryobi Technologies, Inc.
Ryobi Technologies, Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.