Experience
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems
Medtronic Vascular
Represented Advanced Cardiovascular Systems (ACS) in jury trial on patent infringement claims involving cardiovascular stents and bench trial on enforceability of the patents; obtained a jury verdict for ACS on its infringement claims and a judgment that the patents are enforceable; also obtained summary judgment for ACS on all of Medtronic's infringement and state law counterclaims, which was affirmed on appeal.
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems v. Medtronic Vascular, 1:98-cv-00080, D. Del., Judge Robinson
Medtronic Vascular v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, 05-1280, -1281, -1282, Fed. Cir., Judges Mayer, Lourie, Bryson
A victory at trial for innovator of cardiovascular stents
Abbott Laboratories
Cordis Corp. v. Guidant Inc. (Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc.)
Guidant Inc. (Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc.)
Medtronic, Inc. v. Cardiac Pacemakers
Cardiac Pacemakers
Bell Communications v. Fore Systems Inc.
Bell Communications
Medtronic Vascular Inc. v. Abbott Vascular, Inc.
Abbott Vascular, Inc.
Telcordia Technologies
Arthur A. Collins, Inc. v. Northern Telecom Ltd.
Northern Telecom Ltd. (Nortel)
Solarex Corp.; Amoco Corp. v. Advanced Photovoltaic Systems
Solarex Corp.; Amoco Corporation
Monsanto Co. v. Syngenta Seeds
Syngenta Seeds
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.