Experience
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
Limelight Networks, Inc.
Member of the appellate team representing Akamai before the en banc court and the U.S. Supreme Court in Akamai v. Limelight concerning the issue of divided infringement.
Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., 09-1372, -1417, -1380, -1416, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Linn, Moore
Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc., 12-786; 15-993, S. Ct., Judges Alito, Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan, Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia, Sotomayor, Thomas
Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc.
Trading Technologies International, Inc.
Prolitec Inc. v. Scentair Techs., Inc.
Prolitec Inc.
Kinetic Technologies, Inc. v. Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc.
Kinetic Technologies, Inc.
Trading Technologies, Inc. v. CQG, Inc.
Trading Technologies, Inc.
Innovative Therapies, Inc. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.
Kinetic Concepts, Inc.
Industrial Technology Research Institute v. Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
Industrial Technology Research Institute
Securus Technologies, Inc. v. Global Tel*Link Corp.
Securus Technologies, Inc.
UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks Corp.
Starent Networks Corp.
Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc. v. Movea, Inc.
Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.