直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Overturning a damage award of nearly $20 million involving a novelty beach item

Philip OINESS and Sun Products Group, Inc.

Walgreen Co.

When Walgreen Co. faced a damage award of nearly $20 million, including prejudgment interest, for infringement of a patent on a “head chair,” the company turned to Finnegan. Although Walgreen had sold only $220,000 of the product, a jury awarded over $1 million in lost profits and another $10 million in future lost profits, which grew to nearly $20 million with interest. On appeal, the Federal Circuit agreed with our argument that the jury award, and the expert testimony on which it was based, was so speculative that it could not stand. The court granted a remittitur, reducing the damage award to $220,000—the amount of actual sales—and further reversed the award of prejudgment interest as it was based on future sales that had not occurred.

Philip OINESS and Sun Products Group, Inc. v. Walgreen Co., 95-1138, -1164, -1205, Fed. Cir., Judges Mayer, Cowen, Rader

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Related Industries

Consumer Products

Related Experiences

$45 million judgment overturned for Ericsson

Ericsson Inc.

$290 million damages award against Microsoft upheld for software company i4i

i4i

With hundreds of millions of dollars at stake in revolutionary technology involving genetic engineering, Finnegan prevails for Eli Lilly

Eli Lilly

Federal Circuit affirms $6.5 million damages award for Finnegan client Telcordia Technologies from Cisco Systems

Telcordia Technologies

United Catalysts turns to Finnegan to reverse an unfavorable judgment and $80 million in damages

United Catalysts

Finnegan client LG Electronics obtains award of priority in interference involving refrigerator dispensers

LG Electronics Inc.

LG wins major counterfeit headsets case and scores over $168 million

LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A.

Vacating a $110 million judgment against Finnegan client TCL Communication

TCL Communication Technology

Settlement resolves patent litigation involving paint robots

Fanuc Robotics

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP