Partner
Michael Young is managing partner of Finnegan’s Reston office, where he holds a dynamic patent practice supporting both established industry leaders and emerging ventures. In assisting clients with intellectual property (IP) issues, he draws on extensive experience in district court litigation, post-grant Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings, counseling, and strategic patent prosecution development across a wide array of technologies, with an emphasis on emerging computer and electronic technologies.
Michael’s recent representations have included matters involving sensor-based technologies, robotics, wireless tracking, supply chain management and logistics, telecommunications, Internet of Things (IoT), financial technology (FinTech), and crypto assets. He is particularly experienced in helping early-stage companies navigate the complexities of IP protection and enforcement in fast-evolving digital markets.
Michael is a first-chair litigator who has handled every phase of district court proceedings—from complaint through trial—crafting and executing strategies for both plaintiffs/patent owners and defendants/accused infringers. His approach integrates deep technical insight with comprehensive litigation experience, beginning at pre-filing investigations and through trial verdict.
Michael has immense experience with post-grant proceedings, serving as lead or backup counsel in more than 70 PTAB proceedings across inter partes review (IPR), covered business methods (CBM), and post grant review (PGR) matters that have often involved matters of first impression. Coupled with his litigation experience, Michael has particular insight into the interplay between parallel district court and post-grant review proceedings, a topic on which he writes and speaks.
Michael maintains an active prosecution practice. Over his career, he has led the preparation and oversight of more than a thousand patent applications and strategically guided their development and prosecution. He has built and managed large-scale domestic and international patent portfolios, spanning technologies from FinTech and sensor-based tracking systems to lenticular airship designs. With deep experience in securing patent protection for software innovations, particularly in the FinTech space, both before and after Alice, Michael offers nuanced insight into patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and helps clients align their IP strategies with evolving legal standards.
Prior to joining Finnegan, Michael worked in integrated circuit (IC) design and developed testing software for modems, printers, cash acceptance systems, and other components of automated teller machines (ATMs).
IpVenture, Inc. v. FedEx Corp.
Defending FedEx against two patent infringement lawsuits against package tracking sensor technology; obtained stays pending proceedings at the USPTO; argued for FedEx in an inter partes reexamination and represented FedEx in an IPR of a related patent. The inter partes reexamination and IPR resulted in decisions cancelling all patent claims, and the Federal Circuit affirmed in both instances.
4:11-cv-05367, N.D. Cal., Judges Hamilton, Ryu
4:14-cv-04894, N.D. Cal., Judges Beeler, Hamilton, Seeborg
IPR2014-00833, PTAB, Judges Droesch, Lee, Zecher
16-1911, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, O'Malley
CashEdge, Inc. and CheckFree Corp. v. FIS
Drafted CBM petitions filed by Metavante and FIS, leading to the institution of four CBM review proceedings that each resulted in a final written decision cancelling all patent claims.
3:12-cv-00015, M.D. Fla., Judges Howard, Toomey
CBM2013-00028, -00030, -00031, -00032, PTAB, Judges Grossman, McNamara, Pettigrew
15-1519, -1524, -1529, -1530, Fed. Cir.
SAP America Inc. v. Versata Development Group Inc.
Lead associate on the team for petitioner SAP in the first-ever PGR of a CBM patent; the PTAB ruled that all claims challenged by SAP were invalid under 35 USC § 101, concluding an expedited proceeding requested by SAP that lasted just nine months from petition filing to final written decision cancelling Versata's claims.
CBM2012-00001, PTAB, Judges Elluru, Lee, Medley, Tierney
14-1194, Fed. Cir., Judges Hughes, Newman, Plager
Patent protection for innovative golfing technology
1:19-cv-12125, D. Mass., Judges Burroughs, Kelley
IPR2020-00733, -00734, -00735, -00863, PTAB, Judges Grossman, McMillin, Melvin, Saindon, Wieker
FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. v. Roambee Corporation
1:21-cv-00175, D. Del., Judge Connolly
Conference
Best Practices and Tech in Intellectual Property Conference 2026 Best Practices and Tech in Intellectual Property Conference 2026
May 17, 2026
Tel Aviv
Hybrid Seminar
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2026 Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2026
February 11, 2026
New York
Conference
Best Practices and Tech in Intellectual Property Conference Best Practices and Tech in Intellectual Property Conference
March 24-25, 2025
Tel Aviv
Hybrid Seminar
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2025 Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2025
February 19, 2025
New York
Hybrid Seminar
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2024 Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2024
February 21, 2024
New York
Seminar
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2023 Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2023
February 22, 2023
New York
Announcement
Finnegan Announces 2023 Mentors of the Year Finnegan Announces 2023 Mentors of the Year
December 29, 2023
Announcement
Finnegan Announces 2022 Mentors of the Year Finnegan Announces 2022 Mentors of the Year
December 30, 2022
Commentary
NFT Ownership Is Complicated NFT Ownership Is Complicated
August 25, 2022
The Wall Street JournalCommentary
Will Intellectual Property Issues Sidetrack NFT Adoption? Will Intellectual Property Issues Sidetrack NFT Adoption?
July 18, 2022
CointelegraphMedia Mention
PTAB Reverses Denial of SharkNinja IPR Request PTAB Reverses Denial of SharkNinja IPR Request
November 18, 2021
Law360Media Mention
PTAB Axes Another iRobot Patent in SharkNinja Vacuum Fight PTAB Axes Another iRobot Patent in SharkNinja Vacuum Fight
October 22, 2021
Law360Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.