直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Will Intellectual Property Issues Sidetrack NFT Adoption?

July 18, 2022

Cointelegraph

Two U.S. senators recently wrote a letter to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the U.S. Copyright Office, noting that the rapidly growing but loosely regulated nonfungible token (NFT) industry already touches many areas of human innovation “from academia to entertainment to medicine, art, and beyond.”. The legislators were requesting a study to explain how this emerging technology fits into the world of intellectual property (IP) rights, including copyrights, trademarks, and patents. In this article, Finnegan partners Anna Naydonov and Michael Young provide insight on the trademark and copyright implications related to NFTs and crypto-based innovations.

Michael said, “Many feel it is time for Congress to step in and provide the predictability needed for innovation to flourish…The lack of clarity surrounding patent subject matter eligibility for software remains a top concern for NFTs and other crypto-based innovations in both the [United States] and abroad.” Anna added, “A wave of litigations has already begun for trademarks and copyrights, and courts are grappling with applying principles crafted long before the NFTs existed.”

When asked about concerns and risks over possible over-regulation of NFTs from the government, Michael said, “Such risks always exist, which is why intellectual property and marketing lawyers in this space hope that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the U.S. Copyright Office, the Federal Trade Commission and/or legislators work closely with key industry stakeholders to understand the main legal challenges and the technology behind NFTs and come up with workable solutions.” Anna added, “Regulation and legislation without input from the industry could set the [United States] back as compared with other jurisdictions.”

Read “Will Intellectual Property Issues Sidetrack NFT Adoption?”

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Copyright

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Michael V. Young
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2788
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP