直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
Lionel M. Lavenue
Partner
More
vCard
  • 1875 Explorer Street
  • Suite 800
  • Reston, VA 20190-6023
+1 571 203 2750
lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com

Lionel M. Lavenue

Partner

  • +1 571 203 2750 +1 571 203 2750
  • lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
  • 1875 Explorer Street
  • Suite 800
  • Reston, VA 20190-6023
  • vCard

Lionel Lavenue is a battle-tested patent trial lawyer who relentlessly defends and enforces intellectual property (IP) in consequential disputes facing technology-driven businesses. He has served as lead or first chair counsel in more than 220 patent cases, including 22 bench and jury trials, and in nearly a dozen cases involving trade secrets. Lionel has a reputation for launching multifront defense campaigns for innovative companies targeted by non-practicing entities (NPEs). These efforts have resulted in the dismissal of multiple high-value patent claims, saving clients millions in potential damages. Lionel has led the filing of nearly 200 inter partes review (IPR) petitions and ex parte reexaminations (EPR), applying maximum pressure on opposing patents. He has extensive experience in major patent venues, including the Eastern District of Texas, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC), as well as with arbitration proceedings. His trial-hardened litigation acumen is reinforced by deep patent portfolio and prosecution work, allowing Lionel to align courtroom strategy with long-term enforcement, licensing, and competitive positioning objectives for clients.

Lionel has argued dozens of Markman hearings. He has directed the discovery for numerous complex cases and disputes, and he has taken or defended over 250 depositions. He also has briefed and argued numerous patent/IP appeals at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

 

Lionel’s extensive experience with innovation capture and patent/IP protection includes the preparation of over 2,500 patent applications. He has organized and managed numerous large domestic and foreign patent portfolios. His prosecution experience covers an array of technologies, including those related to the financial services, electrical, aerospace, and automotive industries. Lionel works directly with leading innovators in the artificial intelligence (AI) sector, alongside related fields such as automotive technologies and robotics. This includes counseling on patent applications, opinions, and litigation for AI-related inventions, where Lionel leverages his extensive background in software and computer-implemented technologies, which often overlap with AI systems (e.g., machine learning algorithms, data processing, and automated decision-making).

 

Lionel’s practice includes litigation, patent applications, and opinion work related to business methods, computers, software, and electrical and mechanical devices (including medical devices, especially medical device software applications). He has also directed numerous ex parte and inter partes patent reexamination proceedings, including almost 100 “defensive reexaminations” used during litigations. As one of the first to challenge a patent via the inter partes review (IPR) procedure, he has led the filing of almost 200 IPR petitions and covered business method (CBM) petitions.

 

Lionel has particular insight into patent disputes involving government contracts, including patent infringement claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1498, with extensive experience with numerous cases before the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He holds Public Trust clearance, and previously held Top Secret and Code Word clearances.

 

Lionel routinely lectures to bar associations and aviation groups on patent law issues related to aircraft, rotorcraft, soaring, skydiving, and lighter-than-air technologies. He is an active and current airplane and helicopter pilot (and occasional glider and balloon pilot), and he counsels many aviation and aerospace companies on IP issues. Lionel also has extensive experience with drone, UAV, and UAS technologies. As a Fulbright Scholar, Lionel participated in a visiting scholar program at the Max Planck Institute in Munich, Germany, focusing on the study of foreign and international patent, copyright, and competition law. He has been recognized by Managing Intellectual Property (MIP) as a “Patent Star” on both the national and regional (Virginia) levels as well as by Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) for his practice in the DC region.

 

Lionel and his wife are alpine mountaineers, skydivers, and adventurers. Of the Seven Summits (the highest peaks of the seven continents), they have summited six (Mt. Kilimanjaro in Africa in 1999; Mt. Elbrus in Russia in 2002; Mt. Aconcagua in South America in 2002; Mt. McKinley in North America and Mt. Vinson in Antarctica in 2004; and Mt. Kosciuszko in Oceania in 2007) and plans to finish the seventh of the Seven Summits, with Mt. Everest scheduled for 2028/2029. Lionel is an experienced skydiver (with over 1750 relative-work formation skydives) and holds numerous skydiving world records. He and his wife are scheduled on an early commercial space flight, with World View, in 2027/2028.

 

Lionel works with leading innovators across technology markets including those in the automotive, robotics, and artificial intelligence spaces. Lionel has extensive experience with both front end and back end features of mobile apps, including applications of object-oriented design, HTML5 architecture, the Angular, Apache Kafka, and MICRON frameworks, and BIAN. He has represented Boeing in patent matters relating to aircraft software products; represented Bosch both in patent enforcement and in the defense of multiple patent infringement lawsuits related to various electronic and mechanical technologies; defended various LG entities in multiple patent infringement lawsuits, primarily in the E.D. Texas, involving electronic, mechanical, and telecommunication technologies; and defended Sony in multiple patent infringement lawsuits in the E.D. Texas, N.D. California, and C.D. California, involving electronic, software, and mechanical technologies, as well as in arbitration issues before the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association (JCAA). He has also represented the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) and governmental entities in protecting, defending, and enforcing mechanical, electronic, and software innovations.

 

Et Cetera

  • Served as a law clerk to the Honorable Chief Judge Glenn L. Archer, Jr. for two years at the U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, and served as a law clerk to the Honorable Robert J. Yock for two years at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.
  • Eagle Scout with Silver Palm (God & Country Award and Order of the Arrow).

Experience

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology
Finnegan was hired for this appeal after TCL received an unfavorable judgment of willful infringement, which resulted in a damages award of over $110 million. After Finnegan convinced the Federal Circuit that the claims were patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101, the court reversed the district court’s ruling of no invalidity, vacated the entire judgment against TCL, and awarded costs to TCL. Based on that award, Finnegan further persuaded the Eastern District of Texas to tax $2.35 million in costs.

18-2003, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Prost, Chen

Stragent, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC
Defended BMW against Stragent in a patent infringement case involving voice recognition technology that resulted in dismissal with prejudice after a favorable claim construction order.

6:11-cv-00278, E.D. Tex., Judges Davis, Love

Beacon Navigation, GmbH v. BMW of North America, LLC
Successfully obtained transfer of patent infringement lawsuit from D. Delaware to E.D. Michigan (and, later, a stay of litigation) on behalf of BMW in cases involving GPS tracking and interface technology.

1:11-cv-00930, -00931, D. Del., Judge Sleet
2:13-cv-11407, -11410, E.D. Mich., Judges Duggan, Roberts, Grand, Randon

Omega Patents, LLC v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and BMW of North America, LLC
Representing defendant BMW in a patent infringement action.

1:20-cv-01907, N.D. Ga., Judge Grimberg

HID Global Corporation v. Idemia Identity & Security USA
Represented petitioner HID Global Corp. in inter partes review of patents relating to laser-formed security features in identification cards.

IPR2017-01938, -01939, -01940, 01941, PTAB, Judges Margolies, Easthom, Zado

Protection for Toyota Aviation’s new technologies
Finnegan represented Toyota Aviation, which existed to develop new aircraft for Toyota. Finnegan prepared patent applications for a variety of innovative technologies, including automatic flight planning; displaying airspace information; fabricating a one-piece fuselage; forming a one-piece wing structure; forming filament wound closed-shape structures; primary flight displays; integrated vibration systems for filing and extracting media; chemical debonding agents for composite tooling; media removal devices; pre-filled media volumes for difficult to fill areas; cockpit pilot trays; aircraft circuit breaker assembly; sandwich stiffened composite structures; twin engine powered aircraft to turn single output shaft; and stall recovery systems.
PT Diagnostics v. The Boeing Company
Represented Boeing in patent matters relating to aircraft software products.

2:12-cv-00042, E.D. Tex., Judges Folsom, Gilstrap, Schneider, Craven

SD Holdings LLC v. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA), Inc.
Finnegan successfully defended AOPA in the District of Oregon against the assertion of patents for computerized flight planning and web-based flight navigation. We obtained a swift dismissal of the entire case, avoiding lengthy litigation and licensing attempts by a notorious non-practicing entity (NPE).

3:13-cv-01296, D. Or., Judges Hernandez, Acosta

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.
Worked with technical expert in preparation for trial following the victory in the concurrent ITC case (337-TA-666). Case was settled before trial and our client was awarded its attorneys' fees.

4:08-cv-04567, N.D. Cal., Judges Wilken, Laporte, Larson

Certain Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamp ("CCFL") Inverter Circuits
Successfully represented Monolithic Power Systems in a patent infringement investigation relating to power inverter technology. The Commission found no violation of Section 337 by respondents.

337-TA-666, ITC, Judge Gildea

Stragent, LLC v. BMW et al.

After forcing Stragent to willfully concede in open court that it could not present enough evidence to prove infringement of its asserted patents, which Stragent read on the automotive communications standard AUTOSAR, Finnegan vigorously negotiated for BMW a royalty-free license to Stragent’s entire patent portfolio. Successfully invalidated multiple Stragent patents before the Patent Office, with one victory on appeal and additional IPR petitions pending at the time of case resolution.

1:20-cv-00510, D. Del., Judge Wolson
1:23-cv-00005, D. Del., Judge Wolson
IPR2023-00333, -00334, PTAB
22-2062 , Fed. Cir.
IPR2021-00417, -00418, -00419, PTAB, Judges Galligan, Repko, White

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology

TCL hired Finnegan to handle the appeal of an unfavorable judgment of willful infringement at the Eastern District of Texas, which resulted in a massive damages award of over $110 million. After Finnegan tenaciously convinced the Federal Circuit that the claims were patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101, the court reversed the district court’s ruling of no invalidity, vacated the entire judgment against TCL, and awarded costs to TCL. Based on that award, Finnegan further persuaded the trial court to tax $2.35 million in costs.

18-2003, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Prost, Chen

Stragent, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC

Aggressively defended BMW against Stragent in a patent infringement case involving voice recognition technology that resulted in complete dismissal with prejudice following a favorable claim construction order.

6:11-cv-00278, E.D. Tex., Judges Davis, Love

Beacon Navigation, GmbH v. BMW of North America, LLC

Wholly obtained transfer of patent infringement lawsuit from D. Delaware to E.D. Michigan (and, later, a stay of litigation) on behalf of BMW in cases involving GPS tracking and interface technology.

1:11-cv-00930, -00931, D. Del., Judge Sleet
2:13-cv-11407, -11410, E.D. Mich., Judges Duggan, Roberts, Grand, Randon

Carrum Technologies, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al.

Successfully obtained complete and total victory against Carrum on appeal of the District of Delaware’s claim construction to the Federal Circuit following Carrum’s stipulation of non-infringement under the claim construction, thereby exonerating BMW’s ACC system, first sold in 2000, against Carrum’s 2004 patents. Strategically invalidated several asserted claims through post-grant efforts before the U.S. Patent Office, including IPRs and EPRs, and pursued claims through proceedings before the Eastern District of Virginia to vindicate BMW’s patent challenges.

1:18-cv-01645, D. Del., Judge Andrews
21-1435, 24-1480, Fed. Cir., Judges Clevenger, Cunningham, Lourie, Moore, Prost, Taranto
IPR2019-00902, -00903, -00904, -00905, -00927, 00928, PTAB, Judges Browne, Scanlon, Tornquist
90/019,010, CRU

Patent drafting and prosecution for CentralSquare’s AI technologies

Finnegan is honored and tremendously proud to partner with CentralSquare in developing and protecting its mission-critical software and technology solutions for public sector agencies, including those serving public safety and public administration. Our dynamic team has led the drafting and prosecution of a broad portfolio of artificial intelligence (AI)-related patent applications, advancing CentralSquare’s innovations across emergency services and municipal operations. These AI technologies accelerate emergency response, streamline workflows, and strengthen data-driven decision-making for agencies and the communities they serve.

Working diligently and closely with CentralSquare’s inventors and in-house counsel, we ensure every application captures the technical depth of the invention while aligning with CentralSquare’s strategic goals. We fully prioritize clarity, enforceability, and foresight—refining claims, anticipating examiner challenges, and crafting robust Office Action responses. By anticipating industry trends in AI and preparing forward-looking applications, Finnegan thoroughly positions CentralSquare’s innovations not only to be protected, but also to drive lasting impact in public safety and beyond.

More

Insights

IP Updates

EPR Academy: ALERT – USPTO Introduces New EPR Pre-order Procedure for Determination in Ex Parte Reexaminations EPR Academy: ALERT – USPTO Introduces New EPR Pre-order Procedure for Determination in Ex Parte Reexaminations

April 3, 2026

Articles

Preempting Surprise Injunctions in Germany and the UPC: Strategic Use of the Schutzschrift in Global Patent Litigation

Preempting Surprise Injunctions in Germany and the UPC: Strategic Use of the Schutzschrift in Global Patent Litigation  Preempting Surprise Injunctions in Germany and the UPC: Strategic Use of the Schutzschrift in Global Patent Litigation 

March 27, 2026

Articles

Patent Ruling Shows Quiet Power of State-Law Bad-Faith Statutes

Patent Ruling Shows Quiet Power of State-Law Bad-Faith Statutes Patent Ruling Shows Quiet Power of State-Law Bad-Faith Statutes

February 20, 2026

Bloomberg Law

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 3 of 6: The EPR Appeals Process

EPR Academy, Part 3 of 6: The EPR Appeals Process EPR Academy, Part 3 of 6: The EPR Appeals Process

February 19, 2026

Articles

Global Patent Litigation: Strategic Insights Across U.S., Germany, and China

Global Patent Litigation: Strategic Insights Across U.S., Germany, and China Global Patent Litigation: Strategic Insights Across U.S., Germany, and China

December 18, 2025

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 2 of 6: The EPR Process – From Request to Reexamination Certificate

EPR Academy, Part 2 of 6: The EPR Process – From Request to Reexamination Certificate EPR Academy, Part 2 of 6: The EPR Process – From Request to Reexamination Certificate

December 5, 2025

More

Professional Recognition

"Lionel Lavenue is a terrific patent litigator. He earnestly provides thoughtful advice and always puts his clients’ needs first. I have never been wanting for a response or document when working with Lionel. I very much appreciate his candour and creative solutions to problems. Lionel is truly one of a kind."

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“Lionel is always focused on winning a case. He manages the most complex litigation easily and is excellent at working under pressure. Lionel’s presence is comforting for the client and frightening for the adversary. In short, he enjoys fighting and winning.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

"Lionel Lavenue is an extremely smart and experienced lead partner. A great patent attorney with impressive technical competences. Our outside impression is that he leads his case teams extremely well, and his staff enjoy working with him. We certainly do."

The Legal 500 U.S.

“James Barney, Lionel Lavenue and Doris Johnson Hines have all engaged in Section 337 investigations recently and are three of the best all-round patent litigators on deck.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

"Lionel Lavenue is a terrific patent litigator. He earnestly provides thoughtful advice and always puts his clients’ needs first. I have never been wanting for a response or document when working with Lionel. I very much appreciate his candour and creative solutions to problems. Lionel is truly one of a kind."

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“Lionel is always focused on winning a case. He manages the most complex litigation easily and is excellent at working under pressure. Lionel’s presence is comforting for the client and frightening for the adversary. In short, he enjoys fighting and winning.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

"Lionel Lavenue is an extremely smart and experienced lead partner. A great patent attorney with impressive technical competences. Our outside impression is that he leads his case teams extremely well, and his staff enjoy working with him. We certainly do."

The Legal 500 U.S.

“James Barney, Lionel Lavenue and Doris Johnson Hines have all engaged in Section 337 investigations recently and are three of the best all-round patent litigators on deck.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Commentary

ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign

May 8, 2026

Law360

Press Release

Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 28, 2026

Press Release

Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 24, 2026

Press Release

BMW AG Announces Resolution of WDTX Declaratory Judgment against Onesta, Following Broad Covenant Not to Sue to BMW AG by Onesta BMW AG Announces Resolution of WDTX Declaratory Judgment against Onesta, Following Broad Covenant Not to Sue to BMW AG by Onesta

April 23, 2026

More

Professional Activities

  • Advisory Council of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims
    (2006-present)
  • Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA)
  • American Bar Association
    (IP Section; Forum on Air & Space Law)
  • American Intellectual Property Law Association
  • American Motorcyclist Association (AMA)
  • Beekeepers Association
  • Lawyer-Pilots Bar Association
  • National Aeronautic Association (NAA)
  • National Business Aviation Association (NBAA)
  • Parachutists Over Phorty [Skydiving] Society (POPS)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Bar Association
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims Bar Association
  • United States Parachute Association (USPA)
  • VA Helicopter Association (VHA)
Admissions and Education

Admissions

  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • District of Columbia
  • Florida
  • North Carolina
  • Virginia
  • U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
  • U.S. District Court, M.D. Florida
  • U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida
  • U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois
  • U.S. District Court, E.D. Michigan
  • U.S. District Court, W.D. North Carolina
  • U.S. District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
  • U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas
  • U.S. District Court, N.D. Texas
  • U.S. District Court, S.D. Texas
  • U.S. District Court, W.D. Texas
  • U.S. District Court, E.D. Virginia
  • U.S. District Court, W.D. Virginia
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Education

George Mason University
M.S., Information Systems, 1997
George Washington University Law School
LL.M., Patent Law and Government Procurement Law, 1994
American University, Washington College of Law
J.D., 1992
Vanderbilt University
B.A., Political Science, magna cum laude, 1988

Clerkships

  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, Hon. Glenn Archer
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims, Hon. Robert Yock

Languages

  • German

Lionel's Practices

AI + Finnegan
AI + Patent
Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals
ITC Section 337 Investigations and Trials
Patent Litigation and Trials
Pretrial Strategies
Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR
Prosecution and Portfolio Management
Due Diligence
IP Portfolio Management
Licensing, Pooling, and Other Transactions
Opinions and Counseling

Lionel's Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)
Electrical and Computer Technology
Robotics
Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
Additive Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Communications
Financial Services and Business Systems
Consumer Goods and Services
Consumer Products
Energy
Oil and Gas
Transportation and Logistics
Aerospace, Aviation, and Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
Automotive and Smart Mobility Tech

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP