February 2, 2024
Authored and Edited by Daniel F. Klodowski; Umber Aggarwal; Deena Kablaoui Lanier; Nicholas A. Eitsert; Elliot C. Cook; Aaron L. Parker
In November, the PTAB cancelled 550 (71.34%) instituted claims across 47 IPR and PGR Final Written Decisions, including decisions issued following remand from the Federal Circuit. After review, 201 (26.07%) instituted claims survived, and patent owners conceded 20 (2.59%) instituted claims through motions to amend or disclaimer. For comparison, the cumulative average cancellation rate of instituted claims in IPR, CBM, and PGR Final Written Decisions is about 73%.

On a per-case basis, no instituted or substitute claims survived in 26 (55.32%) decisions, all instituted claims survived in 9 (19.15%) decisions, and a mixed outcome occurred in 12 (25.53%) decisions. A mixed outcome occurs where at least one instituted or substitute claim remains patentable, and at least one is cancelled, in a Final Written Decision.

In December, the PTAB cancelled 581 (88.03%) instituted claims across 42 IPR and PGR Final Written Decisions. In those decisions, 79 (11.97%) instituted claims survived, and patent owners did not concede any instituted claims through motions to amend or disclaimer.

On a per-case basis, no instituted or substitute claims survived in 30 (71.43%) decisions, all instituted claims survived in 4 (9.52%) decisions, and a mixed outcome occurred in 8 (19.05%) decisions.

Through December 31, 2023, the PTAB has cumulatively granted 623 (15.67%) proposed substitute claims in motions to amend while denying 3,354 (84.33%) proposed substitute claims in IPRs.

The overall cumulative instituted claim survival rate in IPRs, CBMs, and PGRs through December 31, 2023, broken down by technology center, is as follows:

The cumulative number of Final Written Decisions through December 31, 2023, separated by technology center, is as follows:

Copyright © 2024 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Webinar
Data and Market Exclusivity: An Update on China’s New Law and Comparisons to the US and Europe
November 19, 2026
Webinar
Hybrid Conference
Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California
October 19-20, 2026
San Francisco
Webinar
2026 Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches
October 14, 2026
Webinar
Conference
2nd Annual Forum on Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation USA & Canada
October 14-16, 2026
New York
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.