August 19, 2026
Authored and Edited by Daniel F. Klodowski; Umber Aggarwal; A. Sasha Hoyt; Annabeth R. Foley; Comfort O. Adeyemi
From June to July 2026, the PTAB cancelled 638 (54.67%) instituted claims across 72 IPR and PGR Final Written Decisions, including decisions issued following remand from the Federal Circuit. After review, 529 (45.33%) instituted claims survived.

For comparison, the cumulative average cancellation rate of instituted claims in IPR, CBM, and PGR Final Written Decisions is about 74%.

On a per-case basis, no instituted or substitute claims survived in 34 (47.22%) decisions, all instituted claims survived in 24 (33.33%) decisions, and a mixed outcome occurred in 14 (19.44%) decisions. A mixed outcome occurs where at least one instituted or substitute claim remains patentable, and at least one is cancelled, in a Final Written Decision.

Through July 31, 2026, the PTAB has cumulatively granted 703 (15.56%) proposed substitute claims in motions to amend while denying 3,815 (84.44%) proposed substitute claims in IPRs.

The overall cumulative instituted claim survival rate in IPRs, CBMs, and PGRs through July 31, 2026, broken down by technology center, is as follows:

The cumulative number of Final Written Decisions through July 31, 2026, separated by technology center, is as follows:

Additional cumulative statistics on the Board’s IPR, CBM, and PGR decisions, updated through July 31, 2026, are available here on the At the PTAB blog.
Various other PTAB metrics collected and generated by Finnegan are reserved for the use of Finnegan and its clients. Stay tuned to the At the PTAB Blog for the latest updates, analysis, and statistics on all aspects of PTAB practice. Subscribe to receive notifications of new posts via email.
Copyright © 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.