直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

USPTO Rule on Agent-Client Privilege Helps, but Gaps Persist

November 9, 2017

Law360

The U.S. Patent and Trademark office recently finalized a rule that amends the standards for Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings and establishes the same privilege between attorneys and clients for patent agents and their clients. The rule aims to address concerns from those who expressed difficulty in discerning the scope of attorney-client privilege at the PTAB and what was protected from discovery during those proceedings. Law360 contacted Finnegan partner Erin M. Sommers for her thoughts on the new rule.

Sommers said, "With the In re Queen’s case [which recognized for the first time a patent agent privilege in cases falling under federal law] and this rule, it definitely shores up a client’s confidence that his or her communications should be protected, assuming they comply with the confines of the new rule."

Tags

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), attorney-client privilege

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Erin M. Sommers, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4292
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP