直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Thousands of Veterans May See Disability Deadline Waived as Supreme Court Takes Up Case

February 23, 2022

Military.com

Finnegan’s client Adolfo Arellano appealed his veterans disability case to be heard at the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). Arellano developed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other mental health conditions following an aircraft carrier collision he experienced during his time in the U.S. Navy. He was unable to file for disability payments by the one-year filing deadline due to the service-related mental health conditions he developed. Arellano argues that the statute of limitations for filing with the Department of Veterans Affairs should have been waived due to the health conditions he was facing, also known as the legal concept, equitable tolling. The claims in the case were initially denied by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and then led to a split decision in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). Finnegan partner James Barney represents Arellano pro bono in the case and said that if the SCOTUS rules in favor of Arellano, the decision has the potential to affect thousands of current and future veterans.

James explained that, as the equitable tolling doctrine operates now, veterans are unable to dispute the one-year deadline “no matter how compelling the individual circumstances.”

He continued, “It would apply a more flexible rule that would be to the benefit of potentially thousands of disabled veterans...The equitable tolling doctrine is only supposed to apply in extenuating circumstances, but when you are talking about disabled veterans, there often are extenuating circumstances.”

James explained that in some cases, veterans fail to file a claim for disability in the first year following discharge due to more reasons than incapacitation: “This would at least give these veterans an opportunity to ask the court to toll these deadlines because, as of right now, the veteran has zero chance of asking for [a waiver].”

James believes that the SCOTUS agreed to hear the case due the division at the CAFC. He said, “When you see that kind of split, it means they need to look into it. That’s the role of the Supreme Court, to step in and try to decide.”

Read "Thousands of Veterans May See Disability Deadline Waived as Supreme Court Takes Up Case"

Tags

veterans, Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), pro bono, equitable tolling

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

James R. Barney
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4412
Email

Related News

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP