直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

No Right to Jury Trial on Patent Fee Shifting, Federal Circuit Rules

August 10, 2017

The National Law Journal

On August 10, 2017, the Federal Circuit ruled in favor of Finnegan client Eli Lilly and its subsidiary Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, ordering Alzheimer's Institute of America (AIA) to pay nearly $8.5 million in attorneys' fees to Eli Lilly and Avid. 

For nearly a decade, AIA filed suit against several university and pharmaceutical researchers, including Avid, alleging infringement on patents covering the research and treatment of Alzheimer's disease. In 2012, Avid argued that AIA never owned the patent and a Pennsylvania district court agreed that AIA did not have standing to assert the patent. The judge also ruled that the evidence showed that AIA's principal conspired with two scientists to hide their blockbuster Alzheimer’s discovery from their university employers. As a result, Avid sought recovery of its attorneys' fees under Section 285 of the Patent Act. 

 

Tags

attorney fees, Protecting American Talent and Entrepreneurship (PATENT) Act

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Pharmaceutical

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP