June 24, 2022
Bloomberg Law
In May 2022, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued new trademark examination guidance, which adjusted the refusal standard for generic marks from "clear evidence" to "sufficient evidence" that the mark is generic and cannot be protected. The USPTO's updated guidance is a reduced threshold that might lead to more denials of trademarks based on genericness. Bloomberg Law interviewed Finnegan attorney and former USPTO trademark examining attorney Dan Stringer to discuss the new USPTO guidance.
Dan stated, "The evidentiary standard with respect to genericness as clear and convincing evidence has been around for over 30 years...So now to go ahead and change it to a reasonable predicate or a reasonable basis for refusing a proposed mark as generic is a pretty big change."
Prior to the updated guidance, trademark refusals based on genericness were uncommon due to attorneys finding ways to work around the threshold, like placing the mark on a secondary register. Dan added, "Ultimately, that might allow a generic term to have some trademark protection, which, as a generic term, it should not have any."
Read "New Guidance Will Boost ‘Generic’ Trademark Denials, Lawyers Say"
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.