直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

New Guidance Will Boost ‘Generic’ Trademark Denials, Lawyers Say

June 24, 2022

Bloomberg Law

In May 2022, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued new trademark examination guidance, which adjusted the refusal standard for generic marks from "clear evidence" to "sufficient evidence" that the mark is generic and cannot be protected. The USPTO's updated guidance is a reduced threshold that might lead to more denials of trademarks based on genericness. Bloomberg Law interviewed Finnegan attorney and former USPTO trademark examining attorney Dan Stringer to discuss the new USPTO guidance. 

Dan stated, "The evidentiary standard with respect to genericness as clear and convincing evidence has been around for over 30 years...So now to go ahead and change it to a reasonable predicate or a reasonable basis for refusing a proposed mark as generic is a pretty big change."

Prior to the updated guidance, trademark refusals based on genericness were uncommon due to attorneys finding ways to work around the threshold, like placing the mark on a secondary register. Dan added, "Ultimately, that might allow a generic term to have some trademark protection, which, as a generic term, it should not have any."

Read "New Guidance Will Boost ‘Generic’ Trademark Denials, Lawyers Say"

Tags

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Counseling and Prosecution

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Daniel S. Stringer
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4322
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Catching Up with Hope Shimabuku

September 29, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Commentary

Bloomberg Law Q&A with Finnegan IP Lawyer Christian Hurt

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP