直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Justices to Review VA Benefits Denial Over Late Application

February 22, 2022

Law360

On February 22, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) agreed to hear a case involving a U.S. Navy veteran’s ability to receive retroactive disability benefits due to a service-related medical disability, thus waiving the Department of Veterans Affairs deadline for filing. Finnegan represents pro bono Navy veteran Adolfo Arellano, who was unable to file for disability benefits for 30 years following discharge from the military. Arellano argues that his effective date to receive disability benefits should be adjusted from 2011 to when he was discharged in 1981. The current law restricts disability back-pay to a year after discharge from service, but under the doctrine of equitable tolling, courts are permitted to waive deadlines on the occasion that the claimant could not discover the injury until after the deadline expired. The case was initially denied in the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and received a split decision in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). If SCOTUS sides in favor of Arellano, the decision could have a major impact on many other disability appeals.

Finnegan partner James Barney represents Arellano in the case and stated, “We are grateful that the Supreme Court has decided to review the Federal Circuit’s en banc Arellano decision, which involves an important issue to many disabled military veterans and their families.”

Read "Justices to Review VA Benefits Denial Over Late Application"

Tags

veterans, Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), equitable tolling, pro bono

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

James R. Barney
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4412
Email

Related News

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP