直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Justices to Review VA Benefits Denial Over Late Application

February 22, 2022

Law360

On February 22, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) agreed to hear a case involving a U.S. Navy veteran’s ability to receive retroactive disability benefits due to a service-related medical disability, thus waiving the Department of Veterans Affairs deadline for filing. Finnegan represents pro bono Navy veteran Adolfo Arellano, who was unable to file for disability benefits for 30 years following discharge from the military. Arellano argues that his effective date to receive disability benefits should be adjusted from 2011 to when he was discharged in 1981. The current law restricts disability back-pay to a year after discharge from service, but under the doctrine of equitable tolling, courts are permitted to waive deadlines on the occasion that the claimant could not discover the injury until after the deadline expired. The case was initially denied in the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and received a split decision in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). If SCOTUS sides in favor of Arellano, the decision could have a major impact on many other disability appeals.

Finnegan partner James Barney represents Arellano in the case and stated, “We are grateful that the Supreme Court has decided to review the Federal Circuit’s en banc Arellano decision, which involves an important issue to many disabled military veterans and their families.”

Read "Justices to Review VA Benefits Denial Over Late Application"

Tags

veterans, Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), equitable tolling, pro bono

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

James R. Barney
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4412
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Commentary

Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge

September 11, 2026

Commentary

Bloomberg Law Q&A with Finnegan IP Lawyer Christian Hurt

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP