直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Jack Daniel’s, Dior Cry ‘Dilution’ as Toys, Porn Star Copy Marks

December 14, 2022

Bloomberg Law

In two recent trademark cases, Jack Daniel’s and Christian Dior cited trademark dilution in their efforts to stop non-competing uses of their marks. Trademark dilution is a concept that protects the owners of famous brands beyond their core product lines to keep consumers from associating the famous brand with an unfavorable or potentially offensive brand. While some attorneys argue that the concept of trademark dilution is superfluous, other attorneys recognize the harm it can cause when a new company tries to ride on the coattails of an established brand.

Finnegan partner Naresh Kilaru said, “In my view [the concept of trademark dilution is] clearly not superfluous. It addresses something that likelihood of confusion doesn’t. Let’s say somebody were to come out with Coca-Cola cars. That would be clearly riding on the goodwill Coca-Cola has.”

Regarding the Christian Dior case, where the company filed an opposition to the registration of a trademark for “Gigi Dior,” an adult film star’s stage name, Naresh said, “Of course the harm there is clear. The Christian Dior case is a perfect example. The theory is if someone is using your trademark in connection with something unsavory or that you believe tarnishes your goodwill, that’s a different type of harm.”

Read "Jack Daniel’s, Dior Cry ‘Dilution’ as Toys, Porn Star Copy Marks"

Tags

trademark dilution

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Consumer Goods and Services

Food and Beverage

Consumer Products

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Naresh Kilaru
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4236
Email

Related News

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Climbs Two Spots on The American Lawyer’s 2026: A-List Runners Up

August 12, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP