直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

Is VPN Use Copyright Infringement? Not So Fast, Lawyers Say

February 3, 2016

Bloomberg BNA

Copyright holders are urging services such as Netflix to crack down on the use of VPN (virtual private network) to access content that is only available in other countries, as the copyright holders view it as copyright infringement. Copyright holders want these services to enforce geographical licensing restrictions, but lawyers indicate that the law is unclear as to whether circumventing these "geoblocks" to access restricted content actually constitutes infringement. The Internet has made it challenging for copyright holders to preserve the long-standing industry practices of geography-based licensing and pricing. Bloomberg BNA reached to Finnegan attorney Margaret A. Esquenet for her thoughts on the issue.

Esquenet notes that although some argue that those watching unauthorized streams are not violating the right to reproduce, the analysis turns on the technical details of each particular service, as well as on issues such as how much content is stored on a user's hard drive at any given time during the streaming process. She attributes the lack of guidance in this area to the fact that there have been very few cases on the issue. Additionally, the few lawsuits that are filed tend to be settled without ever going to court.

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Copyright

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related News

Award/Ranking

Forbes Names Finnegan Partner Erika Harmon Arner on its Inaugural 2026 America’s Top Women Lawyers List

June 5, 2026

Commentary

New Appellate Opinion in Amazon Biometric Data Case May Signal ‘Narrowing’ Scope of BIPA Litigation, Experts Say

May 20, 2026

Commentary

Permanent Injunction Granted to USA Weightlifting Inc., Enjoining Use of Protected Marks

April 24, 2026

Commentary

‘Efficiency Enhancers, Not Revenue Disruptors’: Lawyers Analyse USPTO’s AI Trademark Tools

April 17, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Grills Sanctioned Patent Lawyer Over Conduct

April 9, 2026

Media Mention

Roman War Analogy Unravels Patent Used Against Audi, Tech Firms

March 27, 2026

Commentary

How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Be an Active Participant,' Say Karthik Kumar and Frank DeCosta of Finnegan

March 6, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Associates Honored with Young Lawyer of the Year Award

December 7, 2025

Media Mention

ITC Bans Infringing Drill Bit Imports After Fed. Circ. Remand

December 5, 2025

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP