For years, the Eastern District of Texas has dominated patent law, with nearly 40 percent of all patent suits filed nationwide in the court over the last three years. Patent holders took advantage of being able to file in any district where the defendant made sales and viewed the Eastern District of Texas as patent-friendly. However, the Supreme Court's TC Heartland v. KraftFood decision held that patent owners can only file suit where the defendant is incorporated, or where it has infringed and has a "regular and established place of business." As a result, experts believe that this rule change will likely send more patent cases to Delaware and the Northern District of California. Law360 reached to Finnegan partner Laura P. Masurovsky for her thoughts on the expected shift.
Masurovsky said, "All of the Delaware judges have a mastery of patent law. Delaware is a forum patent litigators wanted to practice in even before TC Heartland because of the expertise of the judges."
Eastern District of Texas, District of Delaware, Northern District of California, Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.