直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Fed Circuit Edict Should Spur Design Patent Refinement

November 1, 2022

Managing Intellectual Property

In a recent design patent case, the Federal Circuit determined that the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois should not have issued a preliminary injunction against companies selling Gyroor branded hoverboards. As the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois is a popular venue for counterfeiting and design patent cases, Managing Intellectual Property interviewed Finnegan partner Elizabeth Ferrill to discuss what this case means for patent owners.

Elizabeth said the case refines the ordinary observer test, which requires plaintiffs to show that ordinary observers familiar with the prior art would believe accused products were the same as patented designs. The court emphasized that the ordinary observer test should have been conducted through the lens of the prior art. The court acknowledged that point before in Egyptian Goddess v Swisa, but it made it even clearer here.

Additionally, she pointed out that the Federal Circuit likewise emphasized that the ordinary observer test had to be done on a product-by-product basis. She said, “That was something that we knew before, but it’s a helpful reminder that gives us something to cite when we’re in similar situations in the future.”

Read “Fed. Circuit Edict Should Spur Design Patent Refinement”

Related Practices

Design Rights

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email

Related News

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP