直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Fed Circuit Edict Should Spur Design Patent Refinement

November 1, 2022

Managing Intellectual Property

In a recent design patent case, the Federal Circuit determined that the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois should not have issued a preliminary injunction against companies selling Gyroor branded hoverboards. As the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois is a popular venue for counterfeiting and design patent cases, Managing Intellectual Property interviewed Finnegan partner Elizabeth Ferrill to discuss what this case means for patent owners.

Elizabeth said the case refines the ordinary observer test, which requires plaintiffs to show that ordinary observers familiar with the prior art would believe accused products were the same as patented designs. The court emphasized that the ordinary observer test should have been conducted through the lens of the prior art. The court acknowledged that point before in Egyptian Goddess v Swisa, but it made it even clearer here.

Additionally, she pointed out that the Federal Circuit likewise emphasized that the ordinary observer test had to be done on a product-by-product basis. She said, “That was something that we knew before, but it’s a helpful reminder that gives us something to cite when we’re in similar situations in the future.”

Read “Fed. Circuit Edict Should Spur Design Patent Refinement”

Related Practices

Design Rights

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Commentary

Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge

September 11, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Wins “Hatch-Waxman Litigation Firm of the Year – Branded” and David Weingarten Wins “Patent Strategy Attorney of the Year (South)” at the LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP