While companies are always searching for perfect branding to withstand the ever-changing consumer market, even the most powerful brands can face market pushback market to shifting consumer sentiment, cultural sensitivities, and more. INTA Daily News interviewed Finnegan partner Mark Sommers to discuss the implications brands face when they reduce the usage of a previously popular trademark.
If a brand reduces or retires the use of a trademark, a third party could argue that the mark is abandoned or defunct and seize it at a low cost. Mark stated that the mere “token” use of a mark, meaning limited or sporadic use of the mark, could prevent a third party from successfully arguing an abandonment assertion. He cautioned, “In such cases, companies may not be successful in preventing unrelated third parties from ‘resurrecting’ their marks that have lain dormant for too long.”
Read "Brand Afterlives"
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Wins 2026 Excellence in Construction Award for Washington, DC Office Renovation
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.