直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Permanent Injunction Granted to USA Weightlifting Inc., Enjoining Use of Protected Marks

April 24, 2026

IP Law Daily

A New York federal court has issued a permanent injunction in favor of USA Weightlifting following its March ruling that USA Masters Weightlifting, Inc. infringed multiple federally registered trademarks, including “USA WEIGHTLIFTING” and “USA MASTERS WEIGHTLIFTING.” The court found that USA Masters, an organization that was started by members who were originally part of USA Weightlifting, engaged in continued infringement, cybersquatting, and bad‑faith conduct, and ordered it to cease all use of the disputed marks, transfer domain names, and destroy unauthorized materials. 

Finnegan partner and trademark practice leader Naresh Kilaru provided commentary on the significance of the ruling. 

"The case is not an outlier but is notable for a combination of factors that made injunctive relief relatively straightforward," he said. "USA Weightlifting had federally registered marks, the breakaway group used identical or near-identical marks and trade channels, and the record supported findings of likelihood of confusion, actual confusion, and bad faith—including what the court characterized as ‘slavish copying.’"

Naresh also highlighted the broader implications beyond sports governance, noting that the scope of the decision is not limited to sports governing bodies. "Rather, it reflects a broader trend after the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 where courts apply a rebuttable presumption of irreparable harm once trademark infringement is established, making permanent injunctive relief a very realistic remedy." 

Discussing the decision’s relevance to similar disputes, he added, "The analytical framework for injunctive relief is one that can apply in many trademark disputes involving breakaway groups, affiliates, or former committees. More broadly, the decision sends a message to sport’s governing bodies that breakaway groups using the same or similar name as the official organization will not be tolerated under trademark law.” 

On the injunction’s practical impact for athletes and organizers, Naresh explained, "The injunction is aimed at reducing confusion for athletes and organizers by ensuring that 'USA Weightlifting' and 'USA Masters Weightlifting' branding is used only by the official organization. The order also requires the breakaway group to stop using and transfer control of the contested domains and to destroy unauthorized materials bearing the marks, which should further limit ongoing confusion of participants seeking official masters programming." 

He further clarified that the ruling does not restrict athlete participation. "From a competitive standpoint, the injunction does not prevent masters-aged athletes from competing. Rather, it restricts a particular organization’s ability to do so under branding that the court found likely to confuse consumers," he said. 

Naresh also pointed out that monetary relief remains on the table: "While most trademark cases are about obtaining an injunction and not pursuing money, monetary damages here are a real possibility given the statutory damages available under ACPA and the court’s finding of bad faith conduct."

Read Permanent Injunction Granted to USA Weightlifting Inc., Enjoining Use of Protected Marks 

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Trademark and Brand Management

Related Industries

Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure

Sports, Fitness, and Outdoor Recreation

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Naresh Kilaru
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4236
Email

Related News

Press Release

Ninth Circuit Denies Zync’s Emergency Motion to Stay; BMW’s Preliminary Injunction Remains in Full Effect as Zync Moves to Stay ITC Proceedings

July 24, 2026

Commentary

Generative AI Patents Booming Globally, World IP Org. Reports

July 17, 2026

Commentary

SCOTUS to Rule on Pepsi Win, Trademark Enforcement Changes Could Follow

July 13, 2026

Commentary

Levi’s Has Filed 2 New Lawsuits This Year to Protect Its Red Tab Trademark

July 9, 2026

Announcement

Erika Harmon Arner Recognized Among Managing Intellectual Property’s Top 250 Women in IP

July 9, 2026

Commentary

‘Oyez, Oyez.’ Supreme Court’s Last Official Crier Dies at 102

July 8, 2026

Commentary

Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects

June 30, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings

June 25, 2026

Commentary

Zync Fights Block of ITC Trade Secret Case Against BMW

June 24, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP