創新、法規、和消費者的選擇是當今型塑能源樣貌和市場的若干因素。創造更高的效能、製造出可擴充的產品、以及建構支援基礎建設的網路是能源製造業因應挑戰和預測未來需求的關鍵驅動力。企業開發和改良可激發創新以及讓種種進步得以實現的技術和素材之際,必需要有精密和富有創意的智財策略作後盾。Finnegan結合科學和工程專業知識與數十年的智財法律經驗,和提供高價值能源解決方案的企業密切合作。
我們透過以下的協助提供服務:
透過法律、技術、與策略上的全方位經驗保護創新
我們能源業務的律師及專家有150位之多,致力於滿足客戶所有智財上的需求。他們多數具有相關科學領域的碩博士學位,例如 : 生物學、化學、生物化學、有機化學、和物理化學,其中多人擁有豐富的研究和/或產業經驗,也有許多人在加入Finnegan之前在業界或大學中已有相當的資歷,或是曾在美國專利商標局擔任過審查委員。
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present novel challenges for businesses looking to invest in intellectual property. Protecting those investments and understanding the innovation landscape is where Finnegan comes in.
From basic elements to highly specialized goods, chemicals play a fundamental role in everything from the raw materials used in manufacturing to the high-tech products that allow us to communicate, travel, eat, and save lives.
Innovative technologies that produce renewable, clean, efficient, and affordable energy are paramount in the quest to solve some of the world’s most pressing challenges.
The oil and gas industry is investing in advances in both upstream and downstream sectors of the industry, from exploration to field and pipeline development to refining.
Secured a decisive victory for client US Synthetic Corp. (USS) at the ITC. After a full hearing, the ALJ found that respondents infringed multiple claims of USS’s patent and that the claims were valid and supported by a domestic industry, but an initial Commission ruling under § 101 temporarily prevented a finding of violation of Section 337. The Federal Circuit reversed the § 101 ruling, and on remand the ITC found a violation and issued a limited exclusion order barring infringing polycrystalline diamond products from entry into the United States, securing final relief for USS.
337-TA-1236, ITC, Judge Elliot
Secured a significant victory for client US Synthetic Corporation (USS) with a precedential decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) overturning an unfavorable 35 U.S.C. § 101 eligibility ruling from the International Trade Commission (ITC).
23-1217, Fed. Cir., Judges Chen, Dyk, Stoll
2:24-cv-00260, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
IPR2025-00592, -00593, -00594, -00595, PTAB
1:20-cv-01622, D. Del., Judge Noreika
IPR2021-00988, -00989, PTAB, Judges Kaiser, Obermann, Range
23-1508, 23-1516, Fed. Cir., Judges Cunningham, Lourie, Reyna
1:20-cv-00189, S.D.N.Y., Judge Rakoff
At the PTAB Blog
February 24, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Pruning the Branches: Director Limits Parallel PTAB Petitions in PacifiCorp v. Birchtech
February 6, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Says PTAB’s Delay Is Not a Reviewable “Shenanigan” Under APA
February 2, 2026
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Partner Antje Brambrink Shortlisted for Women in Business Law EMEA Award
May 13, 2026
Press Release
April 28, 2026
Press Release
April 24, 2026
Award/Ranking
IAM Recognizes Six Finnegan Partners in its 2026 Global Leaders Guide
October 22, 2025
Award/Ranking
Seven Finnegan Attorneys Recognized in the 2025 IAM Global Leaders Guide
October 23, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.