直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

TOPCon v. Back-Contact Solar Cells: The Technology Race Fueled by Patent Strategy, Enforcement and Licensing

April 27, 2026

Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)

By Karthik Kumar, Ph.D.; Abhinav Garg

Karthik Kumar and Abhinav Garg analyze the accelerating competition between TOPCon and back‑contact (BC) solar cell technologies, highlighting how portfolios, enforcement strategies, and licensing practices are shaping commercial outcomes. The article examines how stacked innovation and overlapping legacy patents are driving disputes over freedom to operate, while fast‑moving enforcement venues and strategic portfolio acquisitions increase litigation leverage. It considers the implications for manufacturers navigating technology transitions, consolidation, and cross‑licensing in an increasingly IP‑intensive renewable energy market. Click here to read more.

Tags

freedom-to-operate, enforcement

Related Practices

Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions

Licensing, Pooling, and Other Transactions

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Energy

Clean Energy and Renewables

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Karthik Kumar, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4433
Email
Abhinav Garg
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4392
Email

Originally printed in the Intellectual Asset Management on April 27, 2026. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP