從和同事開視訊會議,透過平板電腦諮詢醫生,到使用智慧型手機調整溫控器或存支票,人們緊密連接的程度是前所未見的。溝通從未如此簡單,或從未如此複雜。當研發人員行銷多年前僅只於想像的技術時,多半會激起引人注目的智財挑戰。Finnegan一直都和推動突破通訊技術的企業保有合作關係,倡導應將法律型塑成得以顧及科技的創新。過往的經驗讓我們能夠透過各面向的深謀遠慮,為客戶打造縮短距離,進而幫助建立更穩固連結關係的解決方案。
熟悉法律、科學、與技術
我們專業同仁的背景橫跨通訊領域的各種技術,如網通設備、互聯網、與大數據分析等等。這些同仁與投入開發下一世代產品及前所未見事物的客戶密切合作,因應企業計畫進入的業務領域及打造新市場制訂智財策略。我們透過以下的協助提供服務:
透過法律、技術、與策略上的全方位經驗保護創新
擁有超過125名通訊技術業務的律師及專家,致力於滿足客戶所有智財上的需求。他們多數具有相關科學領域的碩博士學位,例如 : 計算機科學、電子工程、生醫工程、機械工程、和物理學,其中多人擁有豐富的研究和/或產業經驗,也有許多人在加入Finnegan之前在業界或大學中已有相當的資歷,或是曾在美國專利商標局擔任過審查委員。
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present novel challenges for businesses looking to invest in intellectual property. Protecting those investments and understanding the innovation landscape is where Finnegan comes in.
消費者得以使用越來越多,價位上負擔得起,提供個人健康和生活方式指標與詳細信息的可攜式裝置。在連接日益緊密的世界中,此類信息對於協助醫療保健專業人員提供更高層次的照護無比珍貴。
Protecting innovations related to financial services, software, and life sciences has for decades presented unique challenges. Finnegan has played a role in some of the seminal court cases involving the scope of patent protection. With our historical insight and sharp focus on the everchanging patent eligibility landscape, we work with clients across a broad range of technologies.
IoT has revolutionized how people do business. Whether it be in the field of IoT-enabled homes, cars, industrial manufacturing, supply chains, medical electronics, personal devices, or agriculture, IoT is limited only by the designer’s imagination in creating new applications and adding value.
With new media platforms constantly being created, content providers and distributors are tasked with protecting their content and technology in an everchanging landscape.
Persuaded the court that asserted claims directed to an alleged form of geofencing technology were ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The court found the patent invalid and dismissed the case against client Audi with prejudice in the first instance.
4:25-cv-11147, E.D. Mich., Judge Behm
Obtained a $240 million jury verdict for client Promptu in a patent infringement lawsuit against Comcast. The jury found that Comcast willfully infringed Promptu’s patents covering voice recognition technology for TV.
2:16-cv-06516, E.D. Pa., Judge Sanchez
22-1939, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Moore, Taranto
Represented LG Electronics in Investigation concerning certain media technologies in smartphones and televisions, home theater systems, Blu-ray disc players, and tablets. Following trial, all four asserted patents were found not infringed and/or invalid.
337-TA-882, ITC, Judge Shaw
Finnegan represents BrainCo, a developer of brain-machine interface (BMI) wearables that combine electroencephalography (EEG) signal processing with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to enable users to control electronic devices using brain signals. The firm works with BrainCo to develop and implement its intellectual property strategy, including drafting and prosecuting utility and design patent applications, in support of the company’s efforts to build a robust patent portfolio covering innovations and designs related to BMI technologies used in toys, smart home appliances, and robotic devices.
Representing a multinational technology company in developing its artificial intelligence (AI) and neural processing units (NPUs) portfolio, including preparing new patent applications and prosecuting before the patent office.
At the PTAB Blog
June 30, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
June 26, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Reinforces Injury-in-Fact Requirement in Appeals from Post-Grant Proceedings
June 10, 2026
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
Netflix Prevails in Copyright Infringement Suit Regarding Tiger King
May 14, 2026
Award/Ranking
World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners on its 2026 Global Leaders List
June 24, 2026
Award/Ranking
June 5, 2026
Commentary
May 20, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.