直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Future of Fee Shifting in Balance at Supreme Court

February 26, 2014

Managing Intellectual Property

On Wednesday, February 26, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in Octane Fitness v. Icon Health and Highmark v. Allcare. The “two complementary cases” ”concern Section 285 of the Patent Act, which provides for awarding attorney fees to the prevailing parties ‘in exceptional cases’.” Finnegan represents Allcare in the matter, “marking the Supreme Court debut of Finnegan’s veteran litigator Donald Dunner on behalf of Allcare.”

Ahead of oral arguments, Finnegan partner and Allcare counsel Erik R. Puknys spoke with Managing IP. He said Allcare’s position advocates that the Federal Circuit has more expertise in patent cases and should not have to defer to district courts. “Congress has intended that the Federal Circuit be essentially the singular voice of the American courts on what the patent laws mean, subject to some checks by the Supreme Court now and then,” Puknys said. “So it is our view that this is an issue of law that whenever an appellate court is looking at a district court’s legal decision they just look to see if they got it right, and there is no deference to the district court. If the district court made an error of law it ought to reverse.” A decision is expected in May or early June.

Related Professionals

Erik R. Puknys
Partner
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6644
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Forbes Names Finnegan Partner Erika Harmon Arner on its Inaugural 2026 America’s Top Women Lawyers List

June 5, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

Commentary

New Appellate Opinion in Amazon Biometric Data Case May Signal ‘Narrowing’ Scope of BIPA Litigation, Experts Say

May 20, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Partner Antje Brambrink Shortlisted for Women in Business Law EMEA Award

May 13, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Commentary

ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign

May 8, 2026

Commentary

How Litigation Funding Disclosure Could Affect ITC Cases

May 7 , 2026

Award/Ranking

61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

May 7, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP