直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics, and How the Board Handles Remands

January 18, 2017

Managing Intellectual Property

In its January 18, 2017 article, Managing Intellectual Property took a close look at Finnegan's AIA Blog posts to examine Federal Circuit Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) appeal statistics, as well as what parties can expect from cases that are remanded.

As of the start of 2017, the Federal Circuit had decided 155 PTAB appeals from inter partes review (IPR) and covered business method (CBM) reviews. In about 77% of those cases, the court had affirmed the PTAB on every issue and reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in about 8% of the cases. As of January 1, approximately 53% of cases were issued as Rule 36.

In a December blog post, Finnegan discussed what can be expected from the PTAB on remand. Since there are no specified deadlines for remanded cases, it has not been clear as to how remands will be treated. So far, once the Federal Circuit’s mandate has issued, jurisdiction returns to the Board and a teleconference with the PTAB may occur within a week to a month after the mandate issues. Then, the PTAB authorizes the parties to submit briefs explaining the impact of the Federal Circuit's ruling. Briefing by the petitioner and patent owner typically occurs at the same time, but sometimes it is staggered to give the patent owner an extra week. Parties can expect a three to six month wait from the date of the Federal Circuit's mandate for the PTAB to issue its new final written decision on remand.

Tags

remand, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

Related Practices

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

專利局受理之無效程序

專利審理暨訴願委員會受理之無效程序: 多方複審及核准後複審

Related News

Award/Ranking

Forbes Names Finnegan Partner Erika Harmon Arner on its Inaugural 2026 America’s Top Women Lawyers List

June 5, 2026

Press Release

BMW AG Secures Complete Victory at Federal Circuit as Onesta IP, LLC Appeal is Dismissed and Costs Awarded to BMW

April 20, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Ends Anti-Suit Injunction Appeal in BMW Case

April 20, 2026

Commentary

Patent Cases Down 64% YOY at PTAB, up 70% at ITC in Q1 2026

April 15, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Grills Sanctioned Patent Lawyer Over Conduct

April 9, 2026

Commentary

Squires’ Latest PTAB Memo Seeks to Boost U.S. Manufacturing with New Discretionary Factors

March 18, 2026

Commentary

Top Patent Officials to Review Sanofi's Double Patenting Win

March 5, 2026

Commentary

Squires Sinks 2 PTAB Challenges, Including 1 He Instituted

February 20, 2026

Commentary

Finnegan Team Secures $240M Jury Verdict After PTAB Success

February 3, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP