August 30, 2013
Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review
This article from LSIPR discusses a recent amici curiae submitted to a U.S. district court in support of Ambry Genetics and Gene by Gene. Finnegan partner Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D. provided commentary on the patent infringement cases against Myriad Genetics, Inc. and the potential impact of the amici curiae submitted by industry groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), and the Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT). Tridico said Ambry’s argument that Myriad’s method claims are in breach of the First Amendment is “absolutely not something you see in most cases.” He added, “At this point, the parties are only at the preliminary injunction stage. Since public interest is a factor for preliminary injunctions, [the brief] may be considered by the judge in his determination of the public interest in granting the preliminary injunction.” Tridico also noted that even in light of the amici, “It is still a patent infringement case to be decided on the merits.”
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.