直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • 新闻
  • 飞翰事实
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • 慈善性法律援助
  • 管理层
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Once a Mystery, PTAB Remands Start to Take Shape

February 9, 2017

Law360

Since the introduction of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), a long standing question has been, "What happens when the Federal Circuit sends a case back to the board?" Despite PTAB proceedings beginning in 2012, appeals of PTAB decisions to the Federal Circuit did not begin until 2015. Law360 reached to Finnegan partner Jason E. Stach to discuss some of the trends that have emerged out of PTAB remands.

One challenge that attorneys are facing with PTAB remands is that there is no clear guidance. Stach believes that a framework of rules that address things such as a time frame for parties to request a conference call after the mandate issues from the Federal Circuit would be helpful. He said, "Something like that to give people some guidance and the board some guidance, at least to give a little bit of uniformity to the proceedings. But after that, the remands are going to potentially vary widely in what they cover. So I think at that point it’s going to be a panel-specific, case-specific decision on how the remand is going to proceed." Stach was also asked about outcomes of the cases returned to the PTAB. He said, "Just because you won at the Federal Circuit does not mean that you are necessarily going to win on remand. You still need to do your job and persuade the PTAB, they’re still going to look at it with a careful eye."

Tags

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), remand

Related Practices

专利局无效程序

PTAB无效程序:双方复审及授权后复审

联邦巡回法院和最高法院上诉

Related Professionals

Jason E. Stach
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6428
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP