直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • 新闻
  • 飞翰事实
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • 慈善性法律援助
  • 管理层
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Future of Fee Shifting in Balance at Supreme Court

February 26, 2014

Managing Intellectual Property

On Wednesday, February 26, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in Octane Fitness v. Icon Health and Highmark v. Allcare. The “two complementary cases” ”concern Section 285 of the Patent Act, which provides for awarding attorney fees to the prevailing parties ‘in exceptional cases’.” Finnegan represents Allcare in the matter, “marking the Supreme Court debut of Finnegan’s veteran litigator Donald Dunner on behalf of Allcare.”

Ahead of oral arguments, Finnegan partner and Allcare counsel Erik R. Puknys spoke with Managing IP. He said Allcare’s position advocates that the Federal Circuit has more expertise in patent cases and should not have to defer to district courts. “Congress has intended that the Federal Circuit be essentially the singular voice of the American courts on what the patent laws mean, subject to some checks by the Supreme Court now and then,” Puknys said. “So it is our view that this is an issue of law that whenever an appellate court is looking at a district court’s legal decision they just look to see if they got it right, and there is no deference to the district court. If the district court made an error of law it ought to reverse.” A decision is expected in May or early June.

Related Professionals

Erik R. Puknys
合伙人
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6644
Email

Related News

Commentary

Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects

June 30, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings

June 25, 2026

Commentary

Zync Fights Block of ITC Trade Secret Case Against BMW

June 24, 2026

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Commentary

BMW Secures Injunction Forcing Zync to Seek Stay of ITC Trade Secret Case

June 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers

June 22, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized in 2026 BTI Client Service A-Team Rankings

June 22, 2026

Commentary

U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case

June 15, 2026

Commentary

Finnegan Taps Partner from Kirkland to Boost IP Team

June 12, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP