直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • 新闻
  • 飞翰事实
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • 慈善性法律援助
  • 管理层
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Federal Circuit's Cuozzo Opinion Highlights Unresolved IPR Issues

February 9, 2015

Managing Intellectual Property

On February 4, 2015, the Federal Circuit released its first opinion on a Patent Trial and Appeal Board appeal, In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies. Managing Intellectual Property contacted Finnegan attorney Timothy McAnulty to discuss the importance of this opinion on an inter partes review appeal that “affirmed the Board’s final determination, and found no error in the Board’s claim construction under the broadest reasonable interpretation standard, the Board’s obviousness determination, and the Board’s denial of Cuozzo’s motion to amend.” McAnulty, citing Judge Pauline Newman's decent, stated, "The opinion addresses several of the leading issues, but the split panel still highlights the different views on IPRs and the AIA." He goes on to state "Perhaps more notably, the majority held the Federal Circuit lacks jurisdiction to review the Office’s institution decision even after a final written decision."

Tags

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), America Invents Act (AIA), Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC v. Lee

Related Practices

上诉、争议和法律策略

联邦巡回法院和最高法院上诉

专利局无效程序

PTAB无效程序:双方复审及授权后复审

Related Professionals

Timothy P. McAnulty
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4348
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP