直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • 新闻
  • 飞翰事实
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • 慈善性法律援助
  • 管理层
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Circuit Overload: How the Federal Circuit Is Changing

September 24, 2015

Managing Intellectual Property

Over the past five years, the Federal Circuit has experienced several changes, including new judges, pressure from the Supreme Court, and an influx of appeals from the PTAB. Managing Intellectual Property reached to Finnegan partner J. Michael Jakes for his thoughts on the changes at the Federal Circuit.

Jakes, who has argued more than 30 appeals at the Federal Circuit, identifies that recently, the Federal Circuit has been working more in sync and the judges are more willing to resolve issues en banc. In response to critics who believe the Federal Circuit's exclusive jurisdiction over patent cases should be abolished, Jakes disagrees. He believe that the Federal Circuit is more vital now with the increasing importance of the PTAB. He said, "The whole system is changing because of the inter partes review. I think having the Federal Circuit deal with these cases is actually more important for consistency because so much of the development of the law on validity is going to be coming from the Patent Office now. Splitting that up would get widely divergent results and would probably go back to where things were in the 1960s and 1970s, so the Court may have a more vital role now than before."

Tags

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

Related Practices

全球知识产权维权、诉讼与审判

联邦巡回法院和最高法院上诉

Related Professionals

J. Michael Jakes
合伙人
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4045
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Forbes Names Finnegan Partner Erika Harmon Arner on its Inaugural 2026 America’s Top Women Lawyers List

June 5, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

Commentary

New Appellate Opinion in Amazon Biometric Data Case May Signal ‘Narrowing’ Scope of BIPA Litigation, Experts Say

May 20, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Partner Antje Brambrink Shortlisted for Women in Business Law EMEA Award

May 13, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Commentary

ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign

May 8, 2026

Commentary

How Litigation Funding Disclosure Could Affect ITC Cases

May 7 , 2026

Award/Ranking

61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

May 7, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP